Prosaurolophus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 18, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that species of
Prosaurolophus, a
duckbilled
dinosaur, have been described by
Barnum Brown and
Jack Horner, two of the most prominent
paleontologists of the 20th century? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I decided that there wasn't much more that could be done with this one, short of delving deeply into anatomical details and apomorphies and such. Let it stand or fall! J. Spencer ( talk) 04:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Nice article. Some touching up of the prose is needed, plus the image desciption pages were left in a poor state.
Prose:
Verifiability:
Broadness: Fine
Neutrality: Fine
Stability: Fine
I'm putting it on hold. Narayanese ( talk) 20:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Sidecomment: Given [1], that pic in the description section is most likely a Prosaurolophus maximus, isn't it? Narayanese ( talk) 20:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Upon further review, the Dinosauria II hadrosaurid chapter covers both feeding and locomotion suitably. J. Spencer ( talk) 16:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Prosaurolophus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 18, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that species of
Prosaurolophus, a
duckbilled
dinosaur, have been described by
Barnum Brown and
Jack Horner, two of the most prominent
paleontologists of the 20th century? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I decided that there wasn't much more that could be done with this one, short of delving deeply into anatomical details and apomorphies and such. Let it stand or fall! J. Spencer ( talk) 04:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Nice article. Some touching up of the prose is needed, plus the image desciption pages were left in a poor state.
Prose:
Verifiability:
Broadness: Fine
Neutrality: Fine
Stability: Fine
I'm putting it on hold. Narayanese ( talk) 20:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Sidecomment: Given [1], that pic in the description section is most likely a Prosaurolophus maximus, isn't it? Narayanese ( talk) 20:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Upon further review, the Dinosauria II hadrosaurid chapter covers both feeding and locomotion suitably. J. Spencer ( talk) 16:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)