From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ArnabSaha ( talk · contribs) 08:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: ❯❯❯   S A H A 11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely) reply

Comments

  • Paraphrasing not needed. If you want, you can.
  • Remove MOS:ALLCAPS from citations and citations from lead as per WP:CITELEAD.
    •  Done
    • I have removed the citelead. ❯❯❯   S A H A
  • Link or describe "kuehs" with a note.
    • Linked it and solved some minor issues. ❯❯❯   S A H A
  • Change S$ to US$ using Template:To USD. Keep both currencies, like- S$ abc (US$ xyz).
    •  Done
  • The circle line section starts with "Contract 825". Add more details to it. Same with Contract C902.
  • Some citations are not properly formatted. Example - The Straits Times [17]. Add source date, author.
    •  Done
  • Avoid using & as per MOS:&.
    •  Fixed
  • Avoid one sentence para. MOS:PARA
    •  Fixed
  • Add platform details for line. Like- Circle line uses Platform A/B/C.
    •  Fixed in picture captions.
  • Only Bayfront was linked in the lead. Link the whole Bayfront station.
  • Add wikilinks once. There are some repetitions.
    •  Fixed
  • "Circle line Extension" E is in caps.
  • Previous names not mentioned in the body.
  • "The station is located near ..." add this in the body with ref.
    •  Done
  • Is platform B linked with circle line?
  • Need more station details in the body. Bicycle facilities, Platform levels.
  • Reference needed for Parking, Bicycle facilities, address.
    •  Done
  • More details about PHUNK.
❯❯❯  
 S A H A 
15:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ArnabSaha ( talk · contribs) 08:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: ❯❯❯   S A H A 11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely) reply

Comments

  • Paraphrasing not needed. If you want, you can.
  • Remove MOS:ALLCAPS from citations and citations from lead as per WP:CITELEAD.
    •  Done
    • I have removed the citelead. ❯❯❯   S A H A
  • Link or describe "kuehs" with a note.
    • Linked it and solved some minor issues. ❯❯❯   S A H A
  • Change S$ to US$ using Template:To USD. Keep both currencies, like- S$ abc (US$ xyz).
    •  Done
  • The circle line section starts with "Contract 825". Add more details to it. Same with Contract C902.
  • Some citations are not properly formatted. Example - The Straits Times [17]. Add source date, author.
    •  Done
  • Avoid using & as per MOS:&.
    •  Fixed
  • Avoid one sentence para. MOS:PARA
    •  Fixed
  • Add platform details for line. Like- Circle line uses Platform A/B/C.
    •  Fixed in picture captions.
  • Only Bayfront was linked in the lead. Link the whole Bayfront station.
  • Add wikilinks once. There are some repetitions.
    •  Fixed
  • "Circle line Extension" E is in caps.
  • Previous names not mentioned in the body.
  • "The station is located near ..." add this in the body with ref.
    •  Done
  • Is platform B linked with circle line?
  • Need more station details in the body. Bicycle facilities, Platform levels.
  • Reference needed for Parking, Bicycle facilities, address.
    •  Done
  • More details about PHUNK.
❯❯❯  
 S A H A 
15:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook