From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarification

Hi @ Veverve:. As you will have spotted I don't know much about Jerome, so just to make doubly sure that I've understood you correctly could you confirm that his translation of the four Biblical books I and II Kings + I & II Samuel = one book called the Book of Kings? I am looking at your recent stub Books of the Kingdoms, which seems to be saying that in the Vulgate they are still four books, not one. In passing, may I mention that I think that will be queried as a stub - is there somewhere appropriate to merge / redirect the contents? Best wishes, Ingratis ( talk) 14:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Ingratis: Yes, Jerome's translation of the Libro Regum is indeed of one book which contains what is now commonly considered as I & II Kings + I & II Samuel. I do not know which edition of the Vulgate the Books of the Kingdoms article is referring to so I cannot answer. I do not think the legitimacy of this article will be questionned. Veverve ( talk) 15:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
To quote Jerome: "Then comes Samuel, which we call First and Second Kings. The fourth is Malachim, that is, Kings, which is contained in the third and fourth volumes of Kings." Veverve ( talk) 15:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)# reply
@ Veverve: Thanks for the speedy clarification! I think it would be helpful to make it clearer somewhere that some editions of the Vulgate have these 4 books in one whereas others keep them as 4, but it's not my area and I'll leave it for those who know better. I see now that the stub Books of the Kingdoms has been around some time so will leave well alone. Thanks and best wishes, Ingratis ( talk) 15:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarification

Hi @ Veverve:. As you will have spotted I don't know much about Jerome, so just to make doubly sure that I've understood you correctly could you confirm that his translation of the four Biblical books I and II Kings + I & II Samuel = one book called the Book of Kings? I am looking at your recent stub Books of the Kingdoms, which seems to be saying that in the Vulgate they are still four books, not one. In passing, may I mention that I think that will be queried as a stub - is there somewhere appropriate to merge / redirect the contents? Best wishes, Ingratis ( talk) 14:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Ingratis: Yes, Jerome's translation of the Libro Regum is indeed of one book which contains what is now commonly considered as I & II Kings + I & II Samuel. I do not know which edition of the Vulgate the Books of the Kingdoms article is referring to so I cannot answer. I do not think the legitimacy of this article will be questionned. Veverve ( talk) 15:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
To quote Jerome: "Then comes Samuel, which we call First and Second Kings. The fourth is Malachim, that is, Kings, which is contained in the third and fourth volumes of Kings." Veverve ( talk) 15:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)# reply
@ Veverve: Thanks for the speedy clarification! I think it would be helpful to make it clearer somewhere that some editions of the Vulgate have these 4 books in one whereas others keep them as 4, but it's not my area and I'll leave it for those who know better. I see now that the stub Books of the Kingdoms has been around some time so will leave well alone. Thanks and best wishes, Ingratis ( talk) 15:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook