This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please help me improve the categories of open source advocates (people) and "free and open-source software organizations" (organizations).
Added category "Free and open-source software organizations"
Removed category "Open Source Advocates" from Project Jupyter, an organization, added this category to person Fernando Perez (software developer) who is one of sthe originator of the project mentioned in the article.
Happy to discuss here Spohrer ( talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Sub section Jupyter Notebook:
Should it be "IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?
-- Mortense ( talk) 14:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
I work on d:Wikidata:Scholia. Lots of wiki people like Jupyter and I was talking with someone about Wikidata + Scholia + Jupyter. I was looking at this article and thinking about the sources. Right now, this article is in rough shape and does not cite academic sources. In Scholia somehow 5 academic sources are there and more may appear in the future. See Scholia profile of Jupyter.
Here are two I like -
Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
In " Media coverage", shouldn't some of the responses be summarised? -- Mortense ( talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Why is there an image of Galileo's notebook here?
2600:1700:C280:1CF0:B5DD:E3B6:1965:8E8E ( talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Project Jupyter's name is a reference to the three core programming languages supported by Jupyter, which are Julia, Python and R, and also a homage to Galileo's notebooks recording the discovery of the moons of Jupiter.
This manuscript was shown in 2022 to be fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droodman ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
I deleted a lot of information sourced only to primary sources, without secondary sources to assert importance, and I added new secondary source citations. Of the 25 citations, 12 are now to secondary sources. Is this sufficient to drop the primary sources tag? I have a COI (I work on JupyterLab in a professional capacity) so I will not remove it myself. White 720 ( talk) 15:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please help me improve the categories of open source advocates (people) and "free and open-source software organizations" (organizations).
Added category "Free and open-source software organizations"
Removed category "Open Source Advocates" from Project Jupyter, an organization, added this category to person Fernando Perez (software developer) who is one of sthe originator of the project mentioned in the article.
Happy to discuss here Spohrer ( talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Sub section Jupyter Notebook:
Should it be "IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?
-- Mortense ( talk) 14:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
I work on d:Wikidata:Scholia. Lots of wiki people like Jupyter and I was talking with someone about Wikidata + Scholia + Jupyter. I was looking at this article and thinking about the sources. Right now, this article is in rough shape and does not cite academic sources. In Scholia somehow 5 academic sources are there and more may appear in the future. See Scholia profile of Jupyter.
Here are two I like -
Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
In " Media coverage", shouldn't some of the responses be summarised? -- Mortense ( talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Why is there an image of Galileo's notebook here?
2600:1700:C280:1CF0:B5DD:E3B6:1965:8E8E ( talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Project Jupyter's name is a reference to the three core programming languages supported by Jupyter, which are Julia, Python and R, and also a homage to Galileo's notebooks recording the discovery of the moons of Jupiter.
This manuscript was shown in 2022 to be fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droodman ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
I deleted a lot of information sourced only to primary sources, without secondary sources to assert importance, and I added new secondary source citations. Of the 25 citations, 12 are now to secondary sources. Is this sufficient to drop the primary sources tag? I have a COI (I work on JupyterLab in a professional capacity) so I will not remove it myself. White 720 ( talk) 15:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)