This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skillebrew25. Peer reviewers: ParkerBarkr, Seagullsoars, Stevetheepic.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The last sentence of this article says "This subsequently led to the Chilean coup d'état of 1973, and the death of Salvador Allende." This seems speculative, however.
I don't know much about the details of Project FUBELT itself, but according to the article on Salvador Allende, FUBELT dealt mostly with trying to prevent Allende's presidency before his ratification by Congress in 1970. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.51.176.92 ( talk • contribs) 15 September 2005
Offhand, most of this looks more like it belongs in Wikisource. -- Jmabel | Talk 19:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Project Fubelt must be identical to "Track Two", which is described in the Church report:
It seems to me that this article lacks much context on the impacts of Project FUBELT itself. Undoubtedly there were consequences of the project, as well as context surrounding US motives and Allende's actual involvement in accusations by the US. I think it is imperative to include information about the different demographics in Chile as well, and tying it into US involvement and how the impacts of Project FUBELT may have impacted different people differently. Context of the events leading to, events after, and people affected by Project FUBELT are what this article needs to become less American-centric. Much of the sources cited in this article are just CIA documents, which while effective in proving the US POV, also lacks so much in (forgive me for saying this once again) context. Skillebrew25 ( talk) 21:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC) SKill25
What does the FUBELT mean? -- KnightMove ( talk) 08:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skillebrew25. Peer reviewers: ParkerBarkr, Seagullsoars, Stevetheepic.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The last sentence of this article says "This subsequently led to the Chilean coup d'état of 1973, and the death of Salvador Allende." This seems speculative, however.
I don't know much about the details of Project FUBELT itself, but according to the article on Salvador Allende, FUBELT dealt mostly with trying to prevent Allende's presidency before his ratification by Congress in 1970. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.51.176.92 ( talk • contribs) 15 September 2005
Offhand, most of this looks more like it belongs in Wikisource. -- Jmabel | Talk 19:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Project Fubelt must be identical to "Track Two", which is described in the Church report:
It seems to me that this article lacks much context on the impacts of Project FUBELT itself. Undoubtedly there were consequences of the project, as well as context surrounding US motives and Allende's actual involvement in accusations by the US. I think it is imperative to include information about the different demographics in Chile as well, and tying it into US involvement and how the impacts of Project FUBELT may have impacted different people differently. Context of the events leading to, events after, and people affected by Project FUBELT are what this article needs to become less American-centric. Much of the sources cited in this article are just CIA documents, which while effective in proving the US POV, also lacks so much in (forgive me for saying this once again) context. Skillebrew25 ( talk) 21:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC) SKill25
What does the FUBELT mean? -- KnightMove ( talk) 08:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)