This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc. Christianity Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Editors, please review Wikipedia standards. Articles cannot be original research, which significant parts of this article appear to be. A neutral point of view (NPOV) is also required. NewBluePencil ( talk) 00:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The article relies repeatedly on a few articles, and which themselves may or may not be reporting research yet nevertheless are being used to make authoritative statements about the article topic.

(Wikipedia standards clearly identify what counts as verifiable statements and what are reliable sources to support them.) NewBluePencil ( talk) 01:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply