 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I removed the laundry list of dollar values for auction items except where they seemed particularly notable. Jbh ( talk) 23:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
How do I link in related articles and where do I do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabrinap2015 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- @
Sabrinap2015: If the subject of the article is mentioned in the body of the article you can link it like this:
[[Example]]or[[Example|Your text here]]. If it is related but the subject is not in the text you can create a section at the bottom==See also==and link the articles there. Also, please remember to sign your talk page comments with~~~~and the software will insert your user name and the date/time of your comment. Cheers. Jbh ( talk) 21:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)- I've linked the article from elsewhere, added categories, and I don't think the "overly detailed" tag really applies, most stuff appears reliably sourced and relevant.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- No real objection to tag removal but see my comment here [1]. Jbh ( talk) 12:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- I've linked the article from elsewhere, added categories, and I don't think the "overly detailed" tag really applies, most stuff appears reliably sourced and relevant.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I removed the laundry list of dollar values for auction items except where they seemed particularly notable. Jbh ( talk) 23:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
How do I link in related articles and where do I do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabrinap2015 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- @
Sabrinap2015: If the subject of the article is mentioned in the body of the article you can link it like this:
[[Example]]or[[Example|Your text here]]. If it is related but the subject is not in the text you can create a section at the bottom==See also==and link the articles there. Also, please remember to sign your talk page comments with~~~~and the software will insert your user name and the date/time of your comment. Cheers. Jbh ( talk) 21:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)- I've linked the article from elsewhere, added categories, and I don't think the "overly detailed" tag really applies, most stuff appears reliably sourced and relevant.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- No real objection to tag removal but see my comment here [1]. Jbh ( talk) 12:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- I've linked the article from elsewhere, added categories, and I don't think the "overly detailed" tag really applies, most stuff appears reliably sourced and relevant.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)