![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
![]() | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The term "pan-democracy camp" is long out of date, and as the article notes, when it is used, it tends to be used pejoratively. As a Google search will show, the term "pan-democrats" has been the standard description in both media and across party lines for years now, so how about changing the title to reflect actual usage?
Thinginblack ( talk) 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I went through and rewrote almost the entire article, removing run-on sentences, adding context to poorly-defined statements, removing local jargon, adding basic definitions for those who are unfamiliar with the subject as a whole, removed unnecessary redundant phrasing, removed multiples of repeated nouns/verbs and replaced them with synonyms. Please let me know what you think. It's my goal that china-related articles like this one (typically written in mandarin or standardized chinese and then translated to english) will be more readable for first-language fluent english speakers like myself, and make the affairs of the chinese people more interesting and accessable to english readers. Cheers! Dragonnas ( talk) 18:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Civic party.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 00:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong). There was a definite consensus not to move back to the proposed and previous title (with no HK qualifier), and a slight preference for the patenthetical form "(Hong Kong)" rather than the natural "in Hong Kong", so moving to the parenthetical. — Amakuru ( talk) 11:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong →
Pro-democracy camp – I strongly oppose to the unthoughtful action of someone who just changed it the "pro-democracy camp" to "pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong" which is affecting hundreds of articles. There has not been a problem with the name "pro-democracy camp" until now as it is the most known "pro-democracy camp". Even if it has to add Hong Kong to the title it should have been "pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)" not the current title.
Lmmnhn (
talk) 14:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. —
Amakuru (
talk)
14:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
I found plenty of original research materials without references in this article. Too bad. STSC ( talk) 10:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
To Lmmnhn, you'd better learn what OR is...
"The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material for which no reliable, published sources exist."
"The prohibition against OR means that all material added to articles must be attributable to a reliable, published source."
STSC ( talk) 18:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
As the Yellow ribbon colour represents the Pro-democracy camp, can use the yellow colour? Marxistfounder ( talk) 08:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
The Chinese version of this article has it, should we also put it here? -- Hkfreedomfighter ( talk) 16:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
A couple of editors recently have added it to the infobox without any prior discussion and have repeatedly re-added it when I've removed it, should it be kept in the infobox or should it be removed? Lmmnhn you seem like an expert at this, could u mind giving ur opinion? Thx. Hkfreedomfighter ( talk) 18:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
In the "2020 resignation en masse" section, "as they deemed as unlawful" is missing what it was, they deemed unlawful. -- Damunik ( talk) 10:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
In infobox's 'factions', it should be written as Socialism rather than Social democracy. The influence of Trotskyism among Hong Kong's anti-CCP left-wing socialist parties is significant. Some sources refer to the April Fifth Action itself as Trotsky, and the League of Social Democrats also has moderate Trotskyists like Leung Kwok-hung. ProKMT ( talk) 08:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
References
However, while trade unions in Hong Kong are autonomous, the main union federation, the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU), is considered pro-business and politically conservative and has ties to China's official All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU).
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
![]() | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The term "pan-democracy camp" is long out of date, and as the article notes, when it is used, it tends to be used pejoratively. As a Google search will show, the term "pan-democrats" has been the standard description in both media and across party lines for years now, so how about changing the title to reflect actual usage?
Thinginblack ( talk) 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I went through and rewrote almost the entire article, removing run-on sentences, adding context to poorly-defined statements, removing local jargon, adding basic definitions for those who are unfamiliar with the subject as a whole, removed unnecessary redundant phrasing, removed multiples of repeated nouns/verbs and replaced them with synonyms. Please let me know what you think. It's my goal that china-related articles like this one (typically written in mandarin or standardized chinese and then translated to english) will be more readable for first-language fluent english speakers like myself, and make the affairs of the chinese people more interesting and accessable to english readers. Cheers! Dragonnas ( talk) 18:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Civic party.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 00:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong). There was a definite consensus not to move back to the proposed and previous title (with no HK qualifier), and a slight preference for the patenthetical form "(Hong Kong)" rather than the natural "in Hong Kong", so moving to the parenthetical. — Amakuru ( talk) 11:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong →
Pro-democracy camp – I strongly oppose to the unthoughtful action of someone who just changed it the "pro-democracy camp" to "pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong" which is affecting hundreds of articles. There has not been a problem with the name "pro-democracy camp" until now as it is the most known "pro-democracy camp". Even if it has to add Hong Kong to the title it should have been "pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)" not the current title.
Lmmnhn (
talk) 14:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. —
Amakuru (
talk)
14:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
I found plenty of original research materials without references in this article. Too bad. STSC ( talk) 10:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
To Lmmnhn, you'd better learn what OR is...
"The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material for which no reliable, published sources exist."
"The prohibition against OR means that all material added to articles must be attributable to a reliable, published source."
STSC ( talk) 18:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
As the Yellow ribbon colour represents the Pro-democracy camp, can use the yellow colour? Marxistfounder ( talk) 08:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
The Chinese version of this article has it, should we also put it here? -- Hkfreedomfighter ( talk) 16:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
A couple of editors recently have added it to the infobox without any prior discussion and have repeatedly re-added it when I've removed it, should it be kept in the infobox or should it be removed? Lmmnhn you seem like an expert at this, could u mind giving ur opinion? Thx. Hkfreedomfighter ( talk) 18:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
In the "2020 resignation en masse" section, "as they deemed as unlawful" is missing what it was, they deemed unlawful. -- Damunik ( talk) 10:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
In infobox's 'factions', it should be written as Socialism rather than Social democracy. The influence of Trotskyism among Hong Kong's anti-CCP left-wing socialist parties is significant. Some sources refer to the April Fifth Action itself as Trotsky, and the League of Social Democrats also has moderate Trotskyists like Leung Kwok-hung. ProKMT ( talk) 08:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
References
However, while trade unions in Hong Kong are autonomous, the main union federation, the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU), is considered pro-business and politically conservative and has ties to China's official All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU).