This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve
Underwater diving-related articles to a
feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Merge or split?
Almost all the content in
AS-28 is present in
Priz class. The
AS-28 article should probably be merged into
Priz class to prevent duplication and the articles getting out of sync. There are less than 5 of these small (3-6 man) vessels so even if they all were involved in notable events they could be covered in the
Priz class article.
Richard Taylor 19:50, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The accident should sit at
AS-28, the accident involves AS-28, not every Priz class sub. It's also the most significant of the two (Priz vs AS-28), and the one that the various news services are using as a label for the sub, since it is about the AS-28 and NOT the Priz class.
69.156.19.242 03:06, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I would rather have one long stub than two just graduated sub-stubs. All the info on
Priz class was being repeated at
AS-28 to give it some context, while anyone typing in "Priz" and ending up at Priz class right now is looking for
AS-28. They should stay in one article. -
BanyanTree 03:25, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
This is a developing event and it shouldn't be surprising that
AS-28 was still a stub. There should anyway be one main, bolded, directly relevant article to point to on ITN. So I support separating it back out again.--
Pharos 06:41, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Ditto what Pharos wrote. Split --
Barista | a/k/a マイケル |
T/
C 07:35, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Disagree. We now have two even smaller stubs, both with information out of sync of one-another.
Dan100 (
Talk) 12:25, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Well, there was only one contributor at
Talk:AS-28 not represented here who favors a split.
Category:Submarine accidents exists for a reason, to represent notable vessels ships involved in notable accidents. If the AS-28 is notable enough to be the subject of an ITN blurb, it is certainly notable enough for its own article--
Pharos 12:39, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Re-split: There needn't be much mention of the accident in the Priz article at all, for those concerned about de-synching. -
The Tom 15:26, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve
Underwater diving-related articles to a
feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Merge or split?
Almost all the content in
AS-28 is present in
Priz class. The
AS-28 article should probably be merged into
Priz class to prevent duplication and the articles getting out of sync. There are less than 5 of these small (3-6 man) vessels so even if they all were involved in notable events they could be covered in the
Priz class article.
Richard Taylor 19:50, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The accident should sit at
AS-28, the accident involves AS-28, not every Priz class sub. It's also the most significant of the two (Priz vs AS-28), and the one that the various news services are using as a label for the sub, since it is about the AS-28 and NOT the Priz class.
69.156.19.242 03:06, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
I would rather have one long stub than two just graduated sub-stubs. All the info on
Priz class was being repeated at
AS-28 to give it some context, while anyone typing in "Priz" and ending up at Priz class right now is looking for
AS-28. They should stay in one article. -
BanyanTree 03:25, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
This is a developing event and it shouldn't be surprising that
AS-28 was still a stub. There should anyway be one main, bolded, directly relevant article to point to on ITN. So I support separating it back out again.--
Pharos 06:41, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Ditto what Pharos wrote. Split --
Barista | a/k/a マイケル |
T/
C 07:35, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Disagree. We now have two even smaller stubs, both with information out of sync of one-another.
Dan100 (
Talk) 12:25, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Well, there was only one contributor at
Talk:AS-28 not represented here who favors a split.
Category:Submarine accidents exists for a reason, to represent notable vessels ships involved in notable accidents. If the AS-28 is notable enough to be the subject of an ITN blurb, it is certainly notable enough for its own article--
Pharos 12:39, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Re-split: There needn't be much mention of the accident in the Priz article at all, for those concerned about de-synching. -
The Tom 15:26, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply