![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the river is international, the prevailing usage in the most important issue in deciding the name. If anyone has any data on the usage, please come up with it. In the meanwhile, I would request avoiding moving the article to either UA or BE names unilaterally. -- Irpen 22:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Missing reference to the Stokhod/ Stokhid river. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonetikli ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
It would help if the navigability or non-navigability of the system were also documented. I believe that in the 19th century, steamboats from Pinsk, Belarus, on the Pina River were able regularly to make the journey to Kiev on the Dnieper in Ukraine via the Pina-Pripyat-Dnieper system. See "The 'Rothschilds' of Pinsk and Karlin, by Dr Wolf Zeev Rabinowiwitsch at http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/pinsk1/pine11_066.html
Apparently Pinsk today, according to the Wikipedia entry for the city, still has a riverboat building industry. FurnaldHall ( talk) 22:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Three months ago, Iryna Harpy moved the talk page back but not the article. The undiscussed move was by Lexusuns. I'm going to fix this now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 18:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
There seems to be a conflict over the WP:TITLE of the article, as well as which transliteration variants should be prominent. In the first instance, 'Pripyat' or even 'Pripet' (see Encyclopædia Britannica here and here) are the English language WP:COMMONNAME/s. Not only was the article moved to some form of Ukrainian transliteration without discussion or consensus (to be precise, the transliteration only follows Wikipedia's MOS guideline for Ukrainian transliteration, not a globally accepted transliteration system). The editor who moved the article is now edit warring the sequence of transliterations ( here, here, and here) assuming bad faith on my behalf ( 1 and 2). I have requested that the editor follow WP:BRD and bring any content disputes to the article's talk page, but this has been ignored.
As a sign of good faith, Lexusuns, I would ask that you self-revert and discuss any challenged changes prior making them. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 20:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pripyat River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the river is international, the prevailing usage in the most important issue in deciding the name. If anyone has any data on the usage, please come up with it. In the meanwhile, I would request avoiding moving the article to either UA or BE names unilaterally. -- Irpen 22:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Missing reference to the Stokhod/ Stokhid river. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonetikli ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
It would help if the navigability or non-navigability of the system were also documented. I believe that in the 19th century, steamboats from Pinsk, Belarus, on the Pina River were able regularly to make the journey to Kiev on the Dnieper in Ukraine via the Pina-Pripyat-Dnieper system. See "The 'Rothschilds' of Pinsk and Karlin, by Dr Wolf Zeev Rabinowiwitsch at http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/pinsk1/pine11_066.html
Apparently Pinsk today, according to the Wikipedia entry for the city, still has a riverboat building industry. FurnaldHall ( talk) 22:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Three months ago, Iryna Harpy moved the talk page back but not the article. The undiscussed move was by Lexusuns. I'm going to fix this now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 18:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
There seems to be a conflict over the WP:TITLE of the article, as well as which transliteration variants should be prominent. In the first instance, 'Pripyat' or even 'Pripet' (see Encyclopædia Britannica here and here) are the English language WP:COMMONNAME/s. Not only was the article moved to some form of Ukrainian transliteration without discussion or consensus (to be precise, the transliteration only follows Wikipedia's MOS guideline for Ukrainian transliteration, not a globally accepted transliteration system). The editor who moved the article is now edit warring the sequence of transliterations ( here, here, and here) assuming bad faith on my behalf ( 1 and 2). I have requested that the editor follow WP:BRD and bring any content disputes to the article's talk page, but this has been ignored.
As a sign of good faith, Lexusuns, I would ask that you self-revert and discuss any challenged changes prior making them. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 20:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pripyat River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)