![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 22 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Christian von Hannover. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Prince Christian recently married in a catholic ceremony to a catholic girl, I believe when someone marries into the Catholic Church looses its right to the British throne as it happened to Lord Nicholas Windsor . MaliG28 ( talk) 00:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Good point, and the article also claims that he is 2nd in the Line of succession to the Hanoverian throne, but this article suggests that he is third after his nephew. PatGallacher ( talk) 17:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
If titles were abolished in Germany why is this article referring to him as "Prince Christian" when he is a prince in pretense? Wellington Bay ( talk) 19:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 02:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Prince Christian of Hanover → Christian von Hannover or Christian Prinz von Hannover – Per WP:NCROY and the outcome of past discussions in exceedingly similar cases: 1 and 2. There are no princes of Hanover born post 1918; the correct response to the request here should have been to move the two mis-titled sibling pages, not this one. JBL ( talk) 17:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I changed the Infobox from Template:Infobox_royalty to Template:Infobox person, which is suitable because there was no field, which is missing in the more general infobox. Furthermore, as a matter of fact there is no german royalty since 1918 and therefore this indiviual is not royal. I absolutly acknoweledge there is reasonable usage of the Template:Infobox_royalty for individuals in the broader field of royalty, without being royalty in a strict interpretation, where fields are useful, which are only available in Template:Infobox_royalty. As mentioned before, this is not the case here.
@ FlightTime reverted my edit without any reasoning and refused to find a consensus through editing. Therefore, I hope, we can find a a consensus through discussion -- Theoreticalmawi ( talk) 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Substantive, informative explanations indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Explanations are especially important when reverting another editor's good-faith work.-- JBL ( talk) 23:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 22 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Christian von Hannover. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Prince Christian recently married in a catholic ceremony to a catholic girl, I believe when someone marries into the Catholic Church looses its right to the British throne as it happened to Lord Nicholas Windsor . MaliG28 ( talk) 00:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Good point, and the article also claims that he is 2nd in the Line of succession to the Hanoverian throne, but this article suggests that he is third after his nephew. PatGallacher ( talk) 17:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
If titles were abolished in Germany why is this article referring to him as "Prince Christian" when he is a prince in pretense? Wellington Bay ( talk) 19:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 02:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Prince Christian of Hanover → Christian von Hannover or Christian Prinz von Hannover – Per WP:NCROY and the outcome of past discussions in exceedingly similar cases: 1 and 2. There are no princes of Hanover born post 1918; the correct response to the request here should have been to move the two mis-titled sibling pages, not this one. JBL ( talk) 17:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I changed the Infobox from Template:Infobox_royalty to Template:Infobox person, which is suitable because there was no field, which is missing in the more general infobox. Furthermore, as a matter of fact there is no german royalty since 1918 and therefore this indiviual is not royal. I absolutly acknoweledge there is reasonable usage of the Template:Infobox_royalty for individuals in the broader field of royalty, without being royalty in a strict interpretation, where fields are useful, which are only available in Template:Infobox_royalty. As mentioned before, this is not the case here.
@ FlightTime reverted my edit without any reasoning and refused to find a consensus through editing. Therefore, I hope, we can find a a consensus through discussion -- Theoreticalmawi ( talk) 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Substantive, informative explanations indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Explanations are especially important when reverting another editor's good-faith work.-- JBL ( talk) 23:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)