This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
A fact from Prince Archie of Sussex appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the
Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the
project page, where you can
join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Not done The name used reflects her article title and commonly used name, which is
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. There is no reason to deviate from that here. Cheers —
Amakuru (
talk) 09:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Titles.
This section says "not in every day use by their parents" but that's the same with all royal children. Prince William never calls his son "Prince George" in every day conversation.
2A00:23C6:4B42:F301:9DAD:6E7D:7949:6BB (
talk) 10:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Exactly , this part should be removed. Plus that it is even unsourced. The Duke and Duchess of sussex never publicly said that they were entitled to call his children w/out their titles..
196.75.145.115 (
talk) 16:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)reply
It may seem daft, but this is exactly what the cited source says. It is not unsourced. Other sources say much the same. --
Escape Orbit(Talk) 16:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)reply
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change references from 'Lilibet' to 'princess Lilibet'
86.88.10.58 (
talk) 22:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Not done: The only reference to 'Lilibet' is in relation to her birth, at which time, she was not styled, nor entitled to use the title, 'Princess Lilibet'.
EmilySarah99 (
talk) 08:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
A fact from Prince Archie of Sussex appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the
Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the
project page, where you can
join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Not done The name used reflects her article title and commonly used name, which is
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. There is no reason to deviate from that here. Cheers —
Amakuru (
talk) 09:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Titles.
This section says "not in every day use by their parents" but that's the same with all royal children. Prince William never calls his son "Prince George" in every day conversation.
2A00:23C6:4B42:F301:9DAD:6E7D:7949:6BB (
talk) 10:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Exactly , this part should be removed. Plus that it is even unsourced. The Duke and Duchess of sussex never publicly said that they were entitled to call his children w/out their titles..
196.75.145.115 (
talk) 16:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)reply
It may seem daft, but this is exactly what the cited source says. It is not unsourced. Other sources say much the same. --
Escape Orbit(Talk) 16:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)reply
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change references from 'Lilibet' to 'princess Lilibet'
86.88.10.58 (
talk) 22:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Not done: The only reference to 'Lilibet' is in relation to her birth, at which time, she was not styled, nor entitled to use the title, 'Princess Lilibet'.
EmilySarah99 (
talk) 08:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)reply