This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please remember:

• Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)
• Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Hebrew)
• Wikipedia:RS

Thanks everyone. In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC) reply

The current article text reads "It was a sleeveless, purple-blue or violet (techelet) robe (me'il), woven in a single piece. The opening in the center for the High Priest's head to pass through was woven, not cut or torn".

I don't read the text of Exodus 28:32 like this - the hole could have been cut out from the woven fabric, which is why a binding would required, 'so that it does not tear' (NKJV).

What does anyone else think? BobKilcoyne ( talk) 05:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC) reply