Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Priestly covenant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moved to Priestly covenant and needs proofreading. Excessive use of foreign language words for too many obvious and basic terms where English will do. In ictu oculi ( talk) 10:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Please note the following;
In light of the above and multiple other minors nuances I am sorry to have to revert your work -It is just too much to have to pick through and correct all of them.--
Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (
talk) 17:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English):
The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources
In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Also removed this
If that's the case then the correct article title is Priestly covenant (views in Judaism). It is okay to do that, if that is the intention, but one doesn't normally pre-POVfork a POVfork article before the generic article exists. And this article content is in the first section, generic. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Temporarily removed for 4 min in restoring English, now reinserted In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
The article is now split into three main sections: In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Contents [hide]
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus( talk) 03:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Covenant of Kehuna →
Priestly covenant – Rationale for the proposed page name change per
WP:EN sources as per
WP:RS in article, checked with usage on Google Books and JSTOR.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 04:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Priestly covenant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moved to Priestly covenant and needs proofreading. Excessive use of foreign language words for too many obvious and basic terms where English will do. In ictu oculi ( talk) 10:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Please note the following;
In light of the above and multiple other minors nuances I am sorry to have to revert your work -It is just too much to have to pick through and correct all of them.--
Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (
talk) 17:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English):
The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources
In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Also removed this
If that's the case then the correct article title is Priestly covenant (views in Judaism). It is okay to do that, if that is the intention, but one doesn't normally pre-POVfork a POVfork article before the generic article exists. And this article content is in the first section, generic. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Temporarily removed for 4 min in restoring English, now reinserted In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
The article is now split into three main sections: In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Contents [hide]
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus( talk) 03:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Covenant of Kehuna →
Priestly covenant – Rationale for the proposed page name change per
WP:EN sources as per
WP:RS in article, checked with usage on Google Books and JSTOR.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 04:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)