Prevailing winds has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Prevailing winds is pronounced: prĕ-văl-īň wīnds
This article has been significantly expanded, taking advantage of recently improved wikipedia articles to bulk up its content. Let me know if anyone seeing any significant gaps in this article's coverage. Thegreatdr ( talk) 19:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, should be done in a couple of days. Sasata ( talk) 08:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok here are my initial set of comments. I think the prose needs some work to make the meterological concepts more readily accessible to the average reader who doesn't know anything about the subject (like me). I offer a number of phrasing tweaks for you to consider.
Lede
Determination for a location
Trades and their impact
Westerlies and their impact
Polar easterlies
Sea and land breezes
Circulation in elevated regions
Effect on precipitation
Effect on flying animal migration
Article prose has improved, and now meets all GA criteria - it's ready for promotion. Thanks for your contribution! Sasata ( talk) 21:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This article is talking essentially about the same phenomenon as Atmospheric circulation and therefore a merger of two articles should be considered.
abhishek singh ( talk) 00:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Prevailing winds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
This article had already been merged from 28 June 2017 to 24 June 2017, when the creator of this article, Benjamin Trovato, undid the merger and removed the merger notice. We had failed to come to an agreement (on my talk page) on whether the article should be merged into Prevailing winds. My arguments for such a merger were:
Prevailing winds has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Prevailing winds is pronounced: prĕ-văl-īň wīnds
This article has been significantly expanded, taking advantage of recently improved wikipedia articles to bulk up its content. Let me know if anyone seeing any significant gaps in this article's coverage. Thegreatdr ( talk) 19:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, should be done in a couple of days. Sasata ( talk) 08:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok here are my initial set of comments. I think the prose needs some work to make the meterological concepts more readily accessible to the average reader who doesn't know anything about the subject (like me). I offer a number of phrasing tweaks for you to consider.
Lede
Determination for a location
Trades and their impact
Westerlies and their impact
Polar easterlies
Sea and land breezes
Circulation in elevated regions
Effect on precipitation
Effect on flying animal migration
Article prose has improved, and now meets all GA criteria - it's ready for promotion. Thanks for your contribution! Sasata ( talk) 21:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This article is talking essentially about the same phenomenon as Atmospheric circulation and therefore a merger of two articles should be considered.
abhishek singh ( talk) 00:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Prevailing winds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
This article had already been merged from 28 June 2017 to 24 June 2017, when the creator of this article, Benjamin Trovato, undid the merger and removed the merger notice. We had failed to come to an agreement (on my talk page) on whether the article should be merged into Prevailing winds. My arguments for such a merger were: