![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The section "Investigations" does not belong here, as it has no relation to the policies issued by Bolsonaro, or their consequences. It is about judicial investigations to some members of the cabinet, for issues that predate Bolsonaro's term of office. The content should be moved to the articles of the cabinet members, if appropiate. Cambalachero ( talk) 02:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Bolsonaro's posts have been removed by Facebook, youtube, Twitter for spreading COVID related misinformation. This is unprecedented. His conduct on COVID has been questioned and has been covered in international media. This need to be added into the article. This deserves in a paragraph. This is the biggest pandemic and his bio will be incomplete without any mention of this despicable conduct. -- Cedix ( talk) 15:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
In this excerpt, two sources are used, one from the Humanitas Unisinos Institute and the other from the Obervatório da Democracia, the latter of which is linked to trade syndicates.
For the Humanitas Unisinos Institute, work has become more precarious and informal, as workers will no longer have the participation of syndicates in mediating contracts. It also points out that due to MP. 1.108, which institutes the hybrid work, and MP. 1.109, which allows teleworking, with early vacations and holidays, and differentiated working hours.
He used an interview with the technical director of the Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos ( English: Intersindical Department of Statistics and Socioeconomic Studies), which is linked to trade syndicates, who says that it is necessary for society to discuss these MPs, as he believes that only trade unions can negotiate labor agreements and that these measures seek to weaken them. However, the study by the FGV at acceptance of this modality has been growing over the years, and also, in report by O Globo, that among workers, some already prefer this modality.
In this article, they discuss how it can be harmful, in the view of the unions, since the worker doesn't have the power to negotiate alone with the employer. The interview was conducted on the TV dos Trabalhadores channel, linked to the ABC Metalworkers' Syndicate. It is clear here that this is not a reality, but a political and economic view on the subject.
The second, on the other hand, was reported by Observaório da Democracia, another website linked to syndicate organizations and the Workers' Party, whose ideological position is against the MPs.
It criticizes MP. 927, which made labor relations more flexible in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, again stating that individual relations between employers and employees are harmful. It also criticizes the home-office, the flexibility and anticipation of vacations and holidays, and the end of the forced payment deducted directly from salary, without the employee's agreement to the syndicates, citing that “experts” claim that this measure is risky for workers.
However, with the end of the compulsory syndicate tax, collections fell by 98% in five years, demonstrating that the majority of workers were not comfortable with the obligation according to article from Poder360.
After I tried, wrongly, to make an abrupt revision, I was cordially corrected by the editor Coltsfan, who added two more fonts.
In the first, from the newspaper O Globo, reported that during 2021, jobs decreased and unemployment increased, causing workers to look for ways to work independently, outside the CLT, according to government data, All those outside this regime are informal workers under Brazilian law. But there is no mention of precarious employment, which may cause confusion for those unfamiliar with Brazilian bureaucracy.
In the second source, in an article of the newspaper Estado de Minas, said that because of the cuts in staff at companies due to Covid-19, many have had to become self-employed, with better salaries, and outside the CLT regime, and many are struggling because they can't earn enough.
Finally, it is clear that this excerpt, and these sources, as well as being unreliable at the time, continue to be unreliable today, are opinions strongly linked to the political ideologies of those who issue them, and go in the opposite direction to reality. It therefore makes no sense to lie about them, which is why I urge you to delete or reword them. Paraguassuu ( talk) 23:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The section "Investigations" does not belong here, as it has no relation to the policies issued by Bolsonaro, or their consequences. It is about judicial investigations to some members of the cabinet, for issues that predate Bolsonaro's term of office. The content should be moved to the articles of the cabinet members, if appropiate. Cambalachero ( talk) 02:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Bolsonaro's posts have been removed by Facebook, youtube, Twitter for spreading COVID related misinformation. This is unprecedented. His conduct on COVID has been questioned and has been covered in international media. This need to be added into the article. This deserves in a paragraph. This is the biggest pandemic and his bio will be incomplete without any mention of this despicable conduct. -- Cedix ( talk) 15:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
In this excerpt, two sources are used, one from the Humanitas Unisinos Institute and the other from the Obervatório da Democracia, the latter of which is linked to trade syndicates.
For the Humanitas Unisinos Institute, work has become more precarious and informal, as workers will no longer have the participation of syndicates in mediating contracts. It also points out that due to MP. 1.108, which institutes the hybrid work, and MP. 1.109, which allows teleworking, with early vacations and holidays, and differentiated working hours.
He used an interview with the technical director of the Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos ( English: Intersindical Department of Statistics and Socioeconomic Studies), which is linked to trade syndicates, who says that it is necessary for society to discuss these MPs, as he believes that only trade unions can negotiate labor agreements and that these measures seek to weaken them. However, the study by the FGV at acceptance of this modality has been growing over the years, and also, in report by O Globo, that among workers, some already prefer this modality.
In this article, they discuss how it can be harmful, in the view of the unions, since the worker doesn't have the power to negotiate alone with the employer. The interview was conducted on the TV dos Trabalhadores channel, linked to the ABC Metalworkers' Syndicate. It is clear here that this is not a reality, but a political and economic view on the subject.
The second, on the other hand, was reported by Observaório da Democracia, another website linked to syndicate organizations and the Workers' Party, whose ideological position is against the MPs.
It criticizes MP. 927, which made labor relations more flexible in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, again stating that individual relations between employers and employees are harmful. It also criticizes the home-office, the flexibility and anticipation of vacations and holidays, and the end of the forced payment deducted directly from salary, without the employee's agreement to the syndicates, citing that “experts” claim that this measure is risky for workers.
However, with the end of the compulsory syndicate tax, collections fell by 98% in five years, demonstrating that the majority of workers were not comfortable with the obligation according to article from Poder360.
After I tried, wrongly, to make an abrupt revision, I was cordially corrected by the editor Coltsfan, who added two more fonts.
In the first, from the newspaper O Globo, reported that during 2021, jobs decreased and unemployment increased, causing workers to look for ways to work independently, outside the CLT, according to government data, All those outside this regime are informal workers under Brazilian law. But there is no mention of precarious employment, which may cause confusion for those unfamiliar with Brazilian bureaucracy.
In the second source, in an article of the newspaper Estado de Minas, said that because of the cuts in staff at companies due to Covid-19, many have had to become self-employed, with better salaries, and outside the CLT regime, and many are struggling because they can't earn enough.
Finally, it is clear that this excerpt, and these sources, as well as being unreliable at the time, continue to be unreliable today, are opinions strongly linked to the political ideologies of those who issue them, and go in the opposite direction to reality. It therefore makes no sense to lie about them, which is why I urge you to delete or reword them. Paraguassuu ( talk) 23:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)