This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The social policy section could use a link to Barack Obama social policy. Also, some of the marijuana policy backtrack could be mentioned as in this edit. Thanks. 97.106.63.26 ( talk) 01:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
the section is about the lack of transparency, i suggest we rename, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Darkstar1st ( talk) 20:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 08:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Edward Snowden leaked details of top-secret American and British government mass surveillance programs to the press. Sources: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57591281/obama-concerned-edward-snowden-could-leak-more/ http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/06/27/196202553/obama-nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-has-more-documents http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/edward-snowden-nsa-leak-george-w-bush-comments-93604.html http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/edward-snowden-steps-secret-us-russia-spy-scuffle/story?id=19495341 http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/26/19156698-hagel-calls-on-russia-to-return-edward-snowden-to-answer-for-serious-security-breach?lite http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23084166 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbazorkzog ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
He's *half* African American. That's like me saying that a glass is full or empty when it's only 50% full. It is neither full nor empty. Obama is either white AND black, or neither. A more correct statement would be that he's the first president with a parent of African descent. MisterZed ( talk) 17:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Do we distinguish African/American from African-American? Hcobb ( talk) 00:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Did anybody repeal the One-drop rule? But can Mr. Obama really lay claim to the heritage of Africans in America the way Mrs. Obama can? Hcobb ( talk) 01:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
There is nothing in this article about America's waging drone wars in the Middle East and Africa and nothing about the PRISM mass surveillence program. Can it be added or not? I believe this is the top current discussions about Obama's presidency at least at the moment. Nyttkonto ( talk) 13:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
I think that these are huge issues worth inclusion. In both cases I think that they were continuations of previous practices (neither was initiated by him), and coverage should acknowledge that, but continuation is also a decision. North8000 ( talk) 01:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
It has been suggested on Talk:Barack Obama that Obama speaking publicly about this event should be stated on this article. For reasons unexplained, Obama feels great affinity with Martin, stating that if he had a son, he would look like Martin, and that 35 years ago, he would have been Martin. The President has said nothing about the vast majority of the thousands of people who are shot dead in the U.S. every year, so it is notable that he spoke directly to the media on a few occasions about Martin and the connection he feels to the case and to Martin personally, despite having never heard of him before his death and having very little in common with him. 94.197.30.250 ( talk) 14:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I agree. All Obama Wikipedia articles should end coverage as of January 20, 2013. After he leaves office. His second term could be covered. No joke. Listen to Scjessey or reject his proposal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.38.179 ( talk) 18:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I just added the following to the article's section on White house visitor logs:
In June 2010, the New York Times reported that Obama administration officials had held hundreds of meetings with lobbyists at coffee houses near the White House, in order to avoid the disclosure requirements for White House visitors, and that these meetings “reveal a disconnect between the Obama administration’s public rhetoric — with Mr. Obama himself frequently thrashing big industries’ ‘battalions’ of lobbyists as enemies of reform — and the administration’s continuing, private dealings with them.” [1]
QbR54190dfcv ( talk) 01:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
The edit history shows that everything that has been added to this article in the last three months has been reverted. Why is this? 71.182.236.185 ( talk) 19:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
On edit: That thing about coffee directly below was not part of my comment, and I don't know why it's there. 71.182.236.185 ( talk) 19:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Once again, after attacking Obama relentlessly,"
(Found in the 2014 Midterm Election section)
This is not maintaining the neutral position Wikipedia is known for.
Should probably be removed or at the least replaced with something more neutral. 68.67.243.116 ( talk) 07:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Not done: please establish a
consensus for this alteration before using the {{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Anupmehra -
Let's talk! 14:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Also, Shamai Leibowitz, a contract linguist for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was convicted of leaking information from embassy wiretaps, [1] John Kiriakou, a former CIA analyst pleaded guilty to passing classified information, [2] Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst for the US Army pleaded guilty to passing classified information to the Wikileaks organization, [3] and James Hitselberger, a former contract linguist for the US Navy in Bahrain is charged with possessing classified documents. [4] Most notably, Edward Snowden, a technical contractor for the NSA and former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is currently at large and has been charged with theft and the unauthorized disclosure of classified information to columnist Glenn Greenwald. [5]
edit Bradley Manning to Chelsea Manning please!
90.209.152.70 (
talk) 13:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article refers to 'Bradley Manning' in at least one section on policy and whistleblowers. The correct name is Chelsea Manning - please correct this error!
90.209.152.70 ( talk) 13:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Presidency of Barack Obama's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "news.yahoo.com":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The infobox in this article is really unnecessary, as it is a duplicate of the infobox in Obama's article and is a biographical infobox. This article is not a biography of Obama, so the infobox is misplaced. I think just an image of him should be left or only the sidebar. Any thoughts? K atástas i (κατάσταση) 16:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Barack Obama | |
---|---|
44th President of the United States | |
Assumed office January 20, 2009 | |
Vice President | Joe Biden |
Preceded by | George W. Bush |
Personal details | |
Born | Honolulu, Hawaii, United States | August 4, 1961
Political party | Democratic |
Website | WhiteHouse.gov |
Tried to ask about this on the Obama biography article with no response but it seems like it's more suited here than there at least.
Is OpEdNews a reliable source? This seems like it belongs in here somewhere. I'm having a bit of difficulty comprehending all this without a nice diagram, but apparently some sort of Canada-to-Gulf-coast pipeline already got completed anyway through Enbridge-owned segments constructed thanks to an Executive Order and the segments of which managed to sidestep the NEPA review process entirely? Having a look at Enbridge's own pipeline maps, it appears they have a pipeline running from the Alberta tar sands all the way to Chicago, Illinois and then back to Cushing, Oklahoma to connect with the rest of the Keystone pipeline segments, effectively completing the ability to transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
Perhaps a single sentence about this belongs in the Environmental Policy section? 174.45.178.216 ( talk) 04:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I've (several times) had to remove inappropriate content because of undue weight. This article is about the presidency of Barack Obama, and partisan attacks from political opponents running to succeed Obama aren't relevant or significant to the presidency. They are more appropriate for campaign articles of the candidates in question. -- Scjessey ( talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Are there any references of scholarly- or other notable opinions as to why Obama has not yet in his presidency used the term Armenian Genocide? The answer might affect the article about the presidency and/or an article I am working on, where one editor is trying to pin a donkey tail on the US ambassador to the UN, regarding this matter. Another question I have asked in the other discussion is, more or less: The tenure of the US ambassador to the UN, is part of the Barack Obama administration; about how many events in the tenure of this ambassador, are more important (for an encyclopedia) than that the ambassador has not yet discussed the Armenian Genocide? 46.212.18.160 ( talk) 20:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
In section 5.3.5 (Killing of Osama bin Laden) there is a wikisource link box, whose link is dead. One with rights should update the "Bin" to lowercase "bin", where the correct source resides ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Remarks_by_the_President_on_Osama_bin_Laden) Simnik(NSK) ( talk) 20:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
There's been some debate about including the infobox on the main page. I think it's useful in that it summarizes key facts about Obama's presidency at a glance. User:Neve-selbert has argued that the infobox is unnecessary since the information is already included in the lede section. What do other people think? Orser67 ( talk) 18:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Raggz, I can't say that I find most or perhaps any of your edits constructive. For instance, creating a section entitled "poverty" only to write a single sentence about how poverty increased under Obama smacks of bias to me. Similarly, creating a section on the economic impact of Obamacare while citing only Donald Trump's campaign website also smacks of bias. Also, I haven't looked at all of your edits, but in one you alleged that you were deleting original research in deleting the second half of this sentence: "The Bush administration established the Guantanamo Bay detention camp to hold alleged terrorists in a manner that did not treat them as conventional prisoners of war." However, the source clearly states "Guantanamo was established under President George W. Bush as a place to hold alleged terrorists, or enemy combatants, rather than treating them as conventional prisoners of war." Does anyone else have thoughts on Raggz's recent edits? Orser67 ( talk) 22:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I created a version of the article in the past tense in my sandbox, I plan on updating the article after Trump is inaugurated and I will try to incorporate any changes made to the article between now and then. Orser67 ( talk) 20:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I see some changes that need to be made with this paragraph. Please feel free to add your input here.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Presidency of Barack Obama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: "January 20, 2009 – January 20, 1017" to "January 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017" Slatergator02 ( talk) 22:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
A IG report about the EPA's response to the Flint crisis was removed under the rationale "Not about Obama". [6] But it is about the presidency of Obama, namely the actions of the Obama adm's EPA. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 23:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article have a separate article spun off (and a bit shorter) on the Obama Administration? That is how it was organized in earlier physical encyclopaedias, where they highlighted the various departments in each subsequent administration, and it would allow some reduction in the length of this article. Are other presidential articles normally this long? Peace. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 14:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
This may have been asked before, but there is a government website dedicated to Obama's presidency ( https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/). It makes sense for this website to be in the infobox, as it is completely about the presidency of Barack Obama, which is what the article is about. Currently, the website in the infobox is the website for Barack Obama himself. Thoughts? Melofors ( talk) 07:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I am curious as to why Ben Rhodes isn't mentioned on the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuppiesPlayingChess ( talk • contribs) 04:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a section titled "Cultural influence". Whilst this subject is certainly interesting, and merits being featured on the wikipedia page for Barack Obama's Presidency, I believe that the subsequent text describing Barack Obama's "cultural influence" as President is irrelevant to the content of the rest of the article. Sweetchildofmine500 ( talk) 19:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The relationship between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netenyahu (who held office for all but two months of Obama's presidency) was notably icy, with many commenting on their mutual distaste for each other.
Typo: Change "Netenyahu" to "Netanyahu". LoekVV ( talk) 12:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of the Obama-administration-backed overthrow of the Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya, in June 2009, in this article? Stevenmitchell ( talk) 21:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The social policy section could use a link to Barack Obama social policy. Also, some of the marijuana policy backtrack could be mentioned as in this edit. Thanks. 97.106.63.26 ( talk) 01:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
the section is about the lack of transparency, i suggest we rename, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Darkstar1st ( talk) 20:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 08:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Edward Snowden leaked details of top-secret American and British government mass surveillance programs to the press. Sources: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57591281/obama-concerned-edward-snowden-could-leak-more/ http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/06/27/196202553/obama-nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-has-more-documents http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/edward-snowden-nsa-leak-george-w-bush-comments-93604.html http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/edward-snowden-steps-secret-us-russia-spy-scuffle/story?id=19495341 http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/26/19156698-hagel-calls-on-russia-to-return-edward-snowden-to-answer-for-serious-security-breach?lite http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23084166 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbazorkzog ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
He's *half* African American. That's like me saying that a glass is full or empty when it's only 50% full. It is neither full nor empty. Obama is either white AND black, or neither. A more correct statement would be that he's the first president with a parent of African descent. MisterZed ( talk) 17:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Do we distinguish African/American from African-American? Hcobb ( talk) 00:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Did anybody repeal the One-drop rule? But can Mr. Obama really lay claim to the heritage of Africans in America the way Mrs. Obama can? Hcobb ( talk) 01:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
There is nothing in this article about America's waging drone wars in the Middle East and Africa and nothing about the PRISM mass surveillence program. Can it be added or not? I believe this is the top current discussions about Obama's presidency at least at the moment. Nyttkonto ( talk) 13:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
I think that these are huge issues worth inclusion. In both cases I think that they were continuations of previous practices (neither was initiated by him), and coverage should acknowledge that, but continuation is also a decision. North8000 ( talk) 01:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
It has been suggested on Talk:Barack Obama that Obama speaking publicly about this event should be stated on this article. For reasons unexplained, Obama feels great affinity with Martin, stating that if he had a son, he would look like Martin, and that 35 years ago, he would have been Martin. The President has said nothing about the vast majority of the thousands of people who are shot dead in the U.S. every year, so it is notable that he spoke directly to the media on a few occasions about Martin and the connection he feels to the case and to Martin personally, despite having never heard of him before his death and having very little in common with him. 94.197.30.250 ( talk) 14:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I agree. All Obama Wikipedia articles should end coverage as of January 20, 2013. After he leaves office. His second term could be covered. No joke. Listen to Scjessey or reject his proposal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.38.179 ( talk) 18:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I just added the following to the article's section on White house visitor logs:
In June 2010, the New York Times reported that Obama administration officials had held hundreds of meetings with lobbyists at coffee houses near the White House, in order to avoid the disclosure requirements for White House visitors, and that these meetings “reveal a disconnect between the Obama administration’s public rhetoric — with Mr. Obama himself frequently thrashing big industries’ ‘battalions’ of lobbyists as enemies of reform — and the administration’s continuing, private dealings with them.” [1]
QbR54190dfcv ( talk) 01:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
The edit history shows that everything that has been added to this article in the last three months has been reverted. Why is this? 71.182.236.185 ( talk) 19:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
On edit: That thing about coffee directly below was not part of my comment, and I don't know why it's there. 71.182.236.185 ( talk) 19:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Once again, after attacking Obama relentlessly,"
(Found in the 2014 Midterm Election section)
This is not maintaining the neutral position Wikipedia is known for.
Should probably be removed or at the least replaced with something more neutral. 68.67.243.116 ( talk) 07:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Not done: please establish a
consensus for this alteration before using the {{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Anupmehra -
Let's talk! 14:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Also, Shamai Leibowitz, a contract linguist for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was convicted of leaking information from embassy wiretaps, [1] John Kiriakou, a former CIA analyst pleaded guilty to passing classified information, [2] Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst for the US Army pleaded guilty to passing classified information to the Wikileaks organization, [3] and James Hitselberger, a former contract linguist for the US Navy in Bahrain is charged with possessing classified documents. [4] Most notably, Edward Snowden, a technical contractor for the NSA and former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is currently at large and has been charged with theft and the unauthorized disclosure of classified information to columnist Glenn Greenwald. [5]
edit Bradley Manning to Chelsea Manning please!
90.209.152.70 (
talk) 13:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article refers to 'Bradley Manning' in at least one section on policy and whistleblowers. The correct name is Chelsea Manning - please correct this error!
90.209.152.70 ( talk) 13:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Presidency of Barack Obama's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "news.yahoo.com":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The infobox in this article is really unnecessary, as it is a duplicate of the infobox in Obama's article and is a biographical infobox. This article is not a biography of Obama, so the infobox is misplaced. I think just an image of him should be left or only the sidebar. Any thoughts? K atástas i (κατάσταση) 16:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Barack Obama | |
---|---|
44th President of the United States | |
Assumed office January 20, 2009 | |
Vice President | Joe Biden |
Preceded by | George W. Bush |
Personal details | |
Born | Honolulu, Hawaii, United States | August 4, 1961
Political party | Democratic |
Website | WhiteHouse.gov |
Tried to ask about this on the Obama biography article with no response but it seems like it's more suited here than there at least.
Is OpEdNews a reliable source? This seems like it belongs in here somewhere. I'm having a bit of difficulty comprehending all this without a nice diagram, but apparently some sort of Canada-to-Gulf-coast pipeline already got completed anyway through Enbridge-owned segments constructed thanks to an Executive Order and the segments of which managed to sidestep the NEPA review process entirely? Having a look at Enbridge's own pipeline maps, it appears they have a pipeline running from the Alberta tar sands all the way to Chicago, Illinois and then back to Cushing, Oklahoma to connect with the rest of the Keystone pipeline segments, effectively completing the ability to transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
Perhaps a single sentence about this belongs in the Environmental Policy section? 174.45.178.216 ( talk) 04:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I've (several times) had to remove inappropriate content because of undue weight. This article is about the presidency of Barack Obama, and partisan attacks from political opponents running to succeed Obama aren't relevant or significant to the presidency. They are more appropriate for campaign articles of the candidates in question. -- Scjessey ( talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Are there any references of scholarly- or other notable opinions as to why Obama has not yet in his presidency used the term Armenian Genocide? The answer might affect the article about the presidency and/or an article I am working on, where one editor is trying to pin a donkey tail on the US ambassador to the UN, regarding this matter. Another question I have asked in the other discussion is, more or less: The tenure of the US ambassador to the UN, is part of the Barack Obama administration; about how many events in the tenure of this ambassador, are more important (for an encyclopedia) than that the ambassador has not yet discussed the Armenian Genocide? 46.212.18.160 ( talk) 20:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
In section 5.3.5 (Killing of Osama bin Laden) there is a wikisource link box, whose link is dead. One with rights should update the "Bin" to lowercase "bin", where the correct source resides ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Remarks_by_the_President_on_Osama_bin_Laden) Simnik(NSK) ( talk) 20:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
There's been some debate about including the infobox on the main page. I think it's useful in that it summarizes key facts about Obama's presidency at a glance. User:Neve-selbert has argued that the infobox is unnecessary since the information is already included in the lede section. What do other people think? Orser67 ( talk) 18:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Raggz, I can't say that I find most or perhaps any of your edits constructive. For instance, creating a section entitled "poverty" only to write a single sentence about how poverty increased under Obama smacks of bias to me. Similarly, creating a section on the economic impact of Obamacare while citing only Donald Trump's campaign website also smacks of bias. Also, I haven't looked at all of your edits, but in one you alleged that you were deleting original research in deleting the second half of this sentence: "The Bush administration established the Guantanamo Bay detention camp to hold alleged terrorists in a manner that did not treat them as conventional prisoners of war." However, the source clearly states "Guantanamo was established under President George W. Bush as a place to hold alleged terrorists, or enemy combatants, rather than treating them as conventional prisoners of war." Does anyone else have thoughts on Raggz's recent edits? Orser67 ( talk) 22:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I created a version of the article in the past tense in my sandbox, I plan on updating the article after Trump is inaugurated and I will try to incorporate any changes made to the article between now and then. Orser67 ( talk) 20:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I see some changes that need to be made with this paragraph. Please feel free to add your input here.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Presidency of Barack Obama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: "January 20, 2009 – January 20, 1017" to "January 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017" Slatergator02 ( talk) 22:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
A IG report about the EPA's response to the Flint crisis was removed under the rationale "Not about Obama". [6] But it is about the presidency of Obama, namely the actions of the Obama adm's EPA. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 23:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article have a separate article spun off (and a bit shorter) on the Obama Administration? That is how it was organized in earlier physical encyclopaedias, where they highlighted the various departments in each subsequent administration, and it would allow some reduction in the length of this article. Are other presidential articles normally this long? Peace. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 14:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
This may have been asked before, but there is a government website dedicated to Obama's presidency ( https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/). It makes sense for this website to be in the infobox, as it is completely about the presidency of Barack Obama, which is what the article is about. Currently, the website in the infobox is the website for Barack Obama himself. Thoughts? Melofors ( talk) 07:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I am curious as to why Ben Rhodes isn't mentioned on the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuppiesPlayingChess ( talk • contribs) 04:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a section titled "Cultural influence". Whilst this subject is certainly interesting, and merits being featured on the wikipedia page for Barack Obama's Presidency, I believe that the subsequent text describing Barack Obama's "cultural influence" as President is irrelevant to the content of the rest of the article. Sweetchildofmine500 ( talk) 19:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Presidency of Barack Obama has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The relationship between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netenyahu (who held office for all but two months of Obama's presidency) was notably icy, with many commenting on their mutual distaste for each other.
Typo: Change "Netenyahu" to "Netanyahu". LoekVV ( talk) 12:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of the Obama-administration-backed overthrow of the Honduran President, Manuel Zelaya, in June 2009, in this article? Stevenmitchell ( talk) 21:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)