![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The result of the proposal was move unsupported per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 14:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
What about the concept of presence as an emergent technology (?): where one is, whether or not one is available, how one can be contacted, how one would prefer to be contacted. Where could an article on this topic be placed, how should it be named? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.95.151 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 22 June 2005
WikiDon 00:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Even if I'm a PSYCer not a Jabberist I think presence technology should be the default page for presence whereas this one needs a rename. Anyone else in support of this plan? -- lynX 17:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I also deem the presence technology article more important than the album article. A disambiguation page might also be a solution? -- JRaue 17:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
*Oppose: The Led Zeppelin album is far more notable than some obscure computer software most people haven't heard.
MegX (
talk) 01:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose, nothing wrong with the current set-up. When I think of Presence I think of the Led Zeppelin album. Also some of the entries on the Presence (disambiguation) page are incorrect. The comic entries should be named "The Presence" (as it is written in the comic books) not "Presence", and I note there are two entries for both on
The Presence.
EastHills (
talk) 23:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible that this album may get confused with: https://itunes.apple.com/au/album/presence-live/id297107310 114.30.111.1 ( talk) 12:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
On The Cover Of Presence In The Water It Looks Like It Spells "CAR" In Capel Letters. Noone Know What It Is In The Water.Where They To Advertise For Selling A Car. Moved this from the article to the discussion page. The Illusional Ministry 23:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Althought the album is mediocre, "Nobody's Fault But Mine" is not a bad song.
It is also on the Page & Plant No Quarter: Jimmy Page and Robert Plant Unledded album.
Does anyone know if there is a Led Zeppelin live version out there?
Yes, on Zeppelins DVD release.
WikiDon 00:52, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
The Yardbirds' track 'For Your Love' was written for them by Graham Gouldman, long before Page was in the band. Halmyre 20:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
...which is totally unrelated to " For Your Life" Edelmand 15:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 10:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Subject - should Presence be moved to Presence (Led Zeppelin album) and Presence (disambiguation) be moved to Presence? Our guidelines say that unless there is one single concept that is by far the most common then the page should be a list of all relevant possibilities. See Power for an example. As such I...
*Oppose the clear consensus was to keep it as a Led Zeppelin album. It was a clear cut majority too. This has been the Led Zeppelin album from the very start of wikipedia.
MegX (
talk) 05:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose, we've only just had an advertised open vote on this.
HelenWatt (
talk) 06:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*I would like to know for those who are voting to support the move, what's their opinion on the disambiguation page for The Wall being moved to
The Wall. If you look at the
The Wall (disambiguation), there are in fact more entries there than Presence disambiguation. Why isn't The Wall being moved?
MegX (
talk) 08:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose. this was already voted on with the same proposal a number of weeks ago and that was a legitimate vote not to change it.
ZhaoHong (
talk) 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose On the contrary, I'm interested in reading about the album and I'm not even a fan. Also Stevertigo, if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. No-one here by the looks of things agrees on your redirect to a religious term.
A-Kartoffel (
talk) 11:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
In the article it is stated, the whole process of recording and mixing took them 18 days and it was finished on Nov 26, 1975. So, why is it stated in the info box "recorded November-December 11975" when it just was November? The mastering was maybe done in December. Saemikneu ( talk) 19:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Presence (album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk · contribs) 16:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
@ Ritchie333: fine dude. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 17:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333: You should add two reviews to the boxscore and also added them and others if possible to the prose. At least don't let the box go into another section if there is more material to add. You can change the English I used to one that pleases you more. In the meantime I will change the charts section, and you should consider split the commercial performance from the critical reception. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 21:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm failing this review as I don't understand what any remaining issues are in the article. You've lost me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333:
That was it, another problem here and there that I would fix. I don't get what you don't understand. I replied to you and explained everything above. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 16:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The result of the proposal was move unsupported per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 14:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
What about the concept of presence as an emergent technology (?): where one is, whether or not one is available, how one can be contacted, how one would prefer to be contacted. Where could an article on this topic be placed, how should it be named? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.95.151 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 22 June 2005
WikiDon 00:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Even if I'm a PSYCer not a Jabberist I think presence technology should be the default page for presence whereas this one needs a rename. Anyone else in support of this plan? -- lynX 17:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I also deem the presence technology article more important than the album article. A disambiguation page might also be a solution? -- JRaue 17:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
*Oppose: The Led Zeppelin album is far more notable than some obscure computer software most people haven't heard.
MegX (
talk) 01:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose, nothing wrong with the current set-up. When I think of Presence I think of the Led Zeppelin album. Also some of the entries on the Presence (disambiguation) page are incorrect. The comic entries should be named "The Presence" (as it is written in the comic books) not "Presence", and I note there are two entries for both on
The Presence.
EastHills (
talk) 23:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible that this album may get confused with: https://itunes.apple.com/au/album/presence-live/id297107310 114.30.111.1 ( talk) 12:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
On The Cover Of Presence In The Water It Looks Like It Spells "CAR" In Capel Letters. Noone Know What It Is In The Water.Where They To Advertise For Selling A Car. Moved this from the article to the discussion page. The Illusional Ministry 23:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Althought the album is mediocre, "Nobody's Fault But Mine" is not a bad song.
It is also on the Page & Plant No Quarter: Jimmy Page and Robert Plant Unledded album.
Does anyone know if there is a Led Zeppelin live version out there?
Yes, on Zeppelins DVD release.
WikiDon 00:52, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
The Yardbirds' track 'For Your Love' was written for them by Graham Gouldman, long before Page was in the band. Halmyre 20:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
...which is totally unrelated to " For Your Life" Edelmand 15:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 10:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Subject - should Presence be moved to Presence (Led Zeppelin album) and Presence (disambiguation) be moved to Presence? Our guidelines say that unless there is one single concept that is by far the most common then the page should be a list of all relevant possibilities. See Power for an example. As such I...
*Oppose the clear consensus was to keep it as a Led Zeppelin album. It was a clear cut majority too. This has been the Led Zeppelin album from the very start of wikipedia.
MegX (
talk) 05:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose, we've only just had an advertised open vote on this.
HelenWatt (
talk) 06:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*I would like to know for those who are voting to support the move, what's their opinion on the disambiguation page for The Wall being moved to
The Wall. If you look at the
The Wall (disambiguation), there are in fact more entries there than Presence disambiguation. Why isn't The Wall being moved?
MegX (
talk) 08:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose. this was already voted on with the same proposal a number of weeks ago and that was a legitimate vote not to change it.
ZhaoHong (
talk) 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*Oppose On the contrary, I'm interested in reading about the album and I'm not even a fan. Also Stevertigo, if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. No-one here by the looks of things agrees on your redirect to a religious term.
A-Kartoffel (
talk) 11:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
In the article it is stated, the whole process of recording and mixing took them 18 days and it was finished on Nov 26, 1975. So, why is it stated in the info box "recorded November-December 11975" when it just was November? The mastering was maybe done in December. Saemikneu ( talk) 19:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Presence (album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk · contribs) 16:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
@ Ritchie333: fine dude. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 17:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333: You should add two reviews to the boxscore and also added them and others if possible to the prose. At least don't let the box go into another section if there is more material to add. You can change the English I used to one that pleases you more. In the meantime I will change the charts section, and you should consider split the commercial performance from the critical reception. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 21:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm failing this review as I don't understand what any remaining issues are in the article. You've lost me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333:
That was it, another problem here and there that I would fix. I don't get what you don't understand. I replied to you and explained everything above. MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 16:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)