This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: British Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the British television task force. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Zoo This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Archives

August 2006 – April 2008

I found nothing on ITV's Prehistoric Park page about a second season; the only source I found on ITV at all was some guy on a forum named "cutter1" saying there'd be a new season in October. Not exactly a reliable source. Jerkov ( talk) 13:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I concur with this; I've seen some of cutter1's assertations on the ITV Primeval forum regarding episode details, and these haven't exactly turned out to be accurate. Nothing less than a press release would justify inclusion of the section. MelicansMatkin ( talk) 19:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I removed the incorrect fact about a aquatrim truck being taken through the time portal. It is copmletey untrue. I have the DVD of it, so i know about all the episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.20.187.182 ( talk) 07:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Was the incorrect fact saying only that.-- Dinonerd4488 ( talk) 00:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Was way over sized. Nigel at one point says it is 18m long, while in reality the largest size suggested is 15m, in 1954 though. While a 2002 study put it at 12m long. Should dis be mentioned? Spinodontosaurus ( talk) 14:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply

When did he say that it was 18m?? If I remember correctly he did state the correct maximum size of 15m. -- 24.36.130.109 ( talk) 02:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply

In the lead, I've changed the genre in from "docu-drama" to "mocumentary", aince the former currently redirects to the latter. In my opinion, "mocumentary" suggests parody for comedic purposes, but the debates in the discussion page disagree ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 11:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC) reply