This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've merged the QUOROM_flow_chart page into the #History section of this article, since it was a stub and doesn't really make sense on its own. I think this is uncontroversial, but happy to discuss if people think it wa a useful stand-alone. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) ^talk 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The merge looks like an improvement to me, thanks. --{{u| Mark viking}} { Talk} 04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

This sounds a bit strange: Researchers have to figure out research objectives that answer the research question, states the keywords, a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria. In the review stage, relevant articles were searched, irrelevant ones are removed. Staffansvensson ( talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Missing "i" in "if", last box of

.