This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Predicate logic redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is predicate calculus redirected to predicate logic, the two are not really the same thing at all. Predicate Calculus should be under the section on AI not maths or logic. Tautologies are the same - no article. - There seems to be a general lack of articles on AI, one of the very few weak areas of Wikipedia - .. Lucien86 21:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC) (I could work as an author in this area but there must be university people who know a lot more about the intricacies of the subject on a formal level than I do, and of course have much better (+free) access to reference information.)
Lucien86 21:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
wvbailey Wvbailey ( talk) 21:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Which is quite obvious after some careful reading. -- Xiaq ( talk) 14:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
As the original author of the 20 March 2013, I ask (from the CBM, who deleted my text), what is more important in the Wikipedia articles: the conformance to rules or the fact that the articles ARE UNDERSTOOD, HELPFUL, ALLOW THE USERS TO UNDERSTAND THE TOPIC?
What do You, user CBM, think, which will undermine the Wikipedia more: lack of educational value or lack of adherence to its internal rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.235.214.24 ( talk) 04:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
This article might as well merge with First-order logic, which is another article in need of a little cleanup (though still informative in its current organization). MgWd ( talk)MgWd and I don't know how to add a timestamp.... —Preceding undated comment added 03:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to get this stub annihilated, and the page name shall be redirected to the more suitable first order logic page. Though I have read that there is a more classical distinction between the two, predicate logic and first-order logic now seem to be rolled together and now this page shall be a hashtag REDIRECT. Meltingwood meow 05:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Predicate logic redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is predicate calculus redirected to predicate logic, the two are not really the same thing at all. Predicate Calculus should be under the section on AI not maths or logic. Tautologies are the same - no article. - There seems to be a general lack of articles on AI, one of the very few weak areas of Wikipedia - .. Lucien86 21:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC) (I could work as an author in this area but there must be university people who know a lot more about the intricacies of the subject on a formal level than I do, and of course have much better (+free) access to reference information.)
Lucien86 21:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
wvbailey Wvbailey ( talk) 21:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Which is quite obvious after some careful reading. -- Xiaq ( talk) 14:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
As the original author of the 20 March 2013, I ask (from the CBM, who deleted my text), what is more important in the Wikipedia articles: the conformance to rules or the fact that the articles ARE UNDERSTOOD, HELPFUL, ALLOW THE USERS TO UNDERSTAND THE TOPIC?
What do You, user CBM, think, which will undermine the Wikipedia more: lack of educational value or lack of adherence to its internal rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.235.214.24 ( talk) 04:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
This article might as well merge with First-order logic, which is another article in need of a little cleanup (though still informative in its current organization). MgWd ( talk)MgWd and I don't know how to add a timestamp.... —Preceding undated comment added 03:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to get this stub annihilated, and the page name shall be redirected to the more suitable first order logic page. Though I have read that there is a more classical distinction between the two, predicate logic and first-order logic now seem to be rolled together and now this page shall be a hashtag REDIRECT. Meltingwood meow 05:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)