This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Civil engineering This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Any reference available to validate the 30% weight savings over conventional? Extraordinary Spaces ( talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC) reply

"Lighter weight equates to less steel ...." is a chicken and egg statement. Also, lower weight does not necessarily equate to less cost as implied. I can easily design a complex geometry that optimizes material but is expensive to manufacture. Some manufacturing design software does not optimize for manufactured cost as overtly as for minimized steel weight. I think that the writer may have more ideas to communicate that they have not fully developed in the statement. Extraordinary Spaces ( talk) 03:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Pre Engineered buildings are the alternate solution for conventional RCC buildings in industrial applications. It has lot of advantages like, faster construction, easy design, comparitively less cost etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathnivasan ( talk • contribs) 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

http://www.interarchbuildings.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings.asp

[ http://www.bajajngp.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings manufacturer

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yndesai ( talk • contribs) 5 January 2015 (UTC)