![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Further references can be drawn from:
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)The role of aspirin in reducing recurrence of complications needs to be emphasised. Diptanshu Talk 07:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Case Western Reserve University/ANTH 302 Darwinian Medicine (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
I am a student in Darwinian Medicine at Case Western Reserve University. I am thinking of adding an evolutionary considerations section to preeclampsia. I have a draft of my proposed changes in my sandbox. I would appreciate any feedback and advice. My username is kayleeS17. Thank you for the help. KayleeS17 ( talk) 15:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The diagnosis of preeclampsia is incorrect you no longer need proteinurea — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
123.243.195.26 (
talk)
11:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)/Expanding WikiProject Medicine (April 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Hi. I will be working on editing this article as part of the UCSF Wikipedia elective. I anticipate both drafting ideas in my sandbox and working directly on the article itself. Any and all potential feedback is appreciated as it comes up. Thank you. CmcUCSF2014 ( talk) 18:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
After reading the article on Pre-eclampsia, I am impressed by the level of detail, organization, and overall high quality of writing. I think it is great how the article uses descriptions of the medical terminology with the medical-ese term wiki-linked following in parentheses. I like this style since it makes the article readable without having learned the medical lexicon and yet is also educational in that it teaches new terms.
I found the first paragraph (introduction) very informative. However, I wonder if it could be simplified in hopes that it’ll be easier to understand if someone wants to do a “quick look up” on the topic.
In terms of minor suggestions, in the signs and symptoms section, second paragraph, “Further” should be “Furthermore” (I think?).
Some questions that I would pose: Under “Causes,” is air pollution an established cause or more of controversial as to whether it is causative? I am not sure but just wanted to make sure that we are in accordance with the Wiki Philosophy of portraying evidence in proportion to the acceptance of it.
I wonder if it’s possible to wiki link a name of a section. Specifically, Differential Diagnosis is section title yet I think it would be useful to have a link to what it means.
Specifically @CmcUCSF2014, I think that your edits were targeted at the most important thing in medical literature - clarifying and making it readable for all. Awesome job! TWil2014 ( talk) 00:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Although they contain different information, it seems redundant to have two sections covering prevention of the condition. 71.51.133.41 ( talk) 02:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATION.113.003664 - cardiovascular implications JFW | T@lk 21:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00070-7 JFW | T@lk 15:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pre-eclampsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://lib.bioinfo.pl/pmid:21656283When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
No longer requires protein in the urine per [1]. Headache is also not prominently mentioned so not sure why the change in the first sentence? Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 01:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
On the etymology of eclampsia, it just refers to a brightening or lighting up, not lightning. See Liddell & Scott's Greek-English Lexicon. Chris
Screening doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3439 JFW | T@lk 12:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would you care to explain what you are talking about here?
Marchino61 ( talk) 00:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
"Abnormal chromosome 19 microRNA cluster (C19MC) impairs extravillus trophoblast cell invasion to the spiral arteries, causing high resistance, low blood flow, and low nutrient supply to the fetus.[16][17][18]"
Surely this is too technical for a Wikipedia article. The word "trophoblast" is not defined in the article (it means placental cell, I believe). And "extravillus"? "Spiral arteries"?
I am doing a PhD in genetics and biochemistry but I don't understand this. Could it be made less technical?
Marchino61 ( talk) 00:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
This article seems to suggest that there is some degree of puerperal occurrence: https://www.propublica.org/article/trusted-health-sites-spread-myths-about-preeclampsia-deadly-pregnancy-complication Should this be added anywhere? Mvolz ( talk) 19:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Further references can be drawn from:
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)The role of aspirin in reducing recurrence of complications needs to be emphasised. Diptanshu Talk 07:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Case Western Reserve University/ANTH 302 Darwinian Medicine (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
I am a student in Darwinian Medicine at Case Western Reserve University. I am thinking of adding an evolutionary considerations section to preeclampsia. I have a draft of my proposed changes in my sandbox. I would appreciate any feedback and advice. My username is kayleeS17. Thank you for the help. KayleeS17 ( talk) 15:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The diagnosis of preeclampsia is incorrect you no longer need proteinurea — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
123.243.195.26 (
talk)
11:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)/Expanding WikiProject Medicine (April 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Hi. I will be working on editing this article as part of the UCSF Wikipedia elective. I anticipate both drafting ideas in my sandbox and working directly on the article itself. Any and all potential feedback is appreciated as it comes up. Thank you. CmcUCSF2014 ( talk) 18:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
After reading the article on Pre-eclampsia, I am impressed by the level of detail, organization, and overall high quality of writing. I think it is great how the article uses descriptions of the medical terminology with the medical-ese term wiki-linked following in parentheses. I like this style since it makes the article readable without having learned the medical lexicon and yet is also educational in that it teaches new terms.
I found the first paragraph (introduction) very informative. However, I wonder if it could be simplified in hopes that it’ll be easier to understand if someone wants to do a “quick look up” on the topic.
In terms of minor suggestions, in the signs and symptoms section, second paragraph, “Further” should be “Furthermore” (I think?).
Some questions that I would pose: Under “Causes,” is air pollution an established cause or more of controversial as to whether it is causative? I am not sure but just wanted to make sure that we are in accordance with the Wiki Philosophy of portraying evidence in proportion to the acceptance of it.
I wonder if it’s possible to wiki link a name of a section. Specifically, Differential Diagnosis is section title yet I think it would be useful to have a link to what it means.
Specifically @CmcUCSF2014, I think that your edits were targeted at the most important thing in medical literature - clarifying and making it readable for all. Awesome job! TWil2014 ( talk) 00:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Although they contain different information, it seems redundant to have two sections covering prevention of the condition. 71.51.133.41 ( talk) 02:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATION.113.003664 - cardiovascular implications JFW | T@lk 21:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00070-7 JFW | T@lk 15:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pre-eclampsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://lib.bioinfo.pl/pmid:21656283When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
No longer requires protein in the urine per [1]. Headache is also not prominently mentioned so not sure why the change in the first sentence? Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 01:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
On the etymology of eclampsia, it just refers to a brightening or lighting up, not lightning. See Liddell & Scott's Greek-English Lexicon. Chris
Screening doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3439 JFW | T@lk 12:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would you care to explain what you are talking about here?
Marchino61 ( talk) 00:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
"Abnormal chromosome 19 microRNA cluster (C19MC) impairs extravillus trophoblast cell invasion to the spiral arteries, causing high resistance, low blood flow, and low nutrient supply to the fetus.[16][17][18]"
Surely this is too technical for a Wikipedia article. The word "trophoblast" is not defined in the article (it means placental cell, I believe). And "extravillus"? "Spiral arteries"?
I am doing a PhD in genetics and biochemistry but I don't understand this. Could it be made less technical?
Marchino61 ( talk) 00:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
This article seems to suggest that there is some degree of puerperal occurrence: https://www.propublica.org/article/trusted-health-sites-spread-myths-about-preeclampsia-deadly-pregnancy-complication Should this be added anywhere? Mvolz ( talk) 19:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)