![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Initially setting importance to 'mid' as this would seem to be one of many generic manufacturers, this one relatively small compared to some. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 18:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
How can I list standard company information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrascoLabs ( talk • contribs) 16:32, 4 January 2008
For example, how is
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries set up? Could I set up a page for Prasco like theirs? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
66.161.128.130 (
talk)
18:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
OK, please consider my new content. I have matched the Teva format as closesly as possible. There is a growing consumer interest in "Authorized Generics" and where to find them. I feel that this article serves as an unbiased information source of who Prasco is, and what Authorized Generics are available under the Prasco name. There are multiple consumers who can only afford to take the generic drug, yet suffer side effects due to the differences between the generic and the brand. With an Authorized Generic, they are certain to have the identical drug experience to the brand. This is a growing area of concern and search on the Web. Thanks for your consideration. PrascoLabs ( talk) 20:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Technically, the CSD tag is justified. The article doesn't make clear why this company is important. However, if this company owns Ambien and Allegra, it is clearly notable; the importance of these drugs needs to be made more explicit in the article, though. Some data about sales of these drugs in their category would help in this regard. -- Richard ( talk) 23:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Initially setting importance to 'mid' as this would seem to be one of many generic manufacturers, this one relatively small compared to some. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 18:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
How can I list standard company information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrascoLabs ( talk • contribs) 16:32, 4 January 2008
For example, how is
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries set up? Could I set up a page for Prasco like theirs? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
66.161.128.130 (
talk)
18:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
OK, please consider my new content. I have matched the Teva format as closesly as possible. There is a growing consumer interest in "Authorized Generics" and where to find them. I feel that this article serves as an unbiased information source of who Prasco is, and what Authorized Generics are available under the Prasco name. There are multiple consumers who can only afford to take the generic drug, yet suffer side effects due to the differences between the generic and the brand. With an Authorized Generic, they are certain to have the identical drug experience to the brand. This is a growing area of concern and search on the Web. Thanks for your consideration. PrascoLabs ( talk) 20:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Technically, the CSD tag is justified. The article doesn't make clear why this company is important. However, if this company owns Ambien and Allegra, it is clearly notable; the importance of these drugs needs to be made more explicit in the article, though. Some data about sales of these drugs in their category would help in this regard. -- Richard ( talk) 23:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)