![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed a bunch of citations to a couple of Master's theses and a Doctoral dissertation. These are not considered reliable sources. Skyerise ( talk) 23:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
While Wikipedia articles are often clarified by judicious use of images, we are required to remain strictly neutral in articles, and must not be seen to be supporting any particular point of view, such as that of a religion, sect, party, nation, or pressure group. The use of an image that gives the impression of being a current devotional work would certainly run counter to that. I've therefore removed an image from the article. Hope everyone is all right with that. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 13:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Further, it looks as if much of the article is from the point-of-view of Sahaj Marg? If that is so, then the rules on neutrality are even more important. Articles must be completely neutral with respect to sects, teachings, cults, or religions, whatever their status. Thus "The Roman Catholic view is that the wafer is the body of Christ" is fine, but "The wafer is the body of Christ" – in Wikipedia's voice – is not. The article needs to be reworked for neutrality, not least by making it clear who believes what. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed a bunch of citations to a couple of Master's theses and a Doctoral dissertation. These are not considered reliable sources. Skyerise ( talk) 23:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
While Wikipedia articles are often clarified by judicious use of images, we are required to remain strictly neutral in articles, and must not be seen to be supporting any particular point of view, such as that of a religion, sect, party, nation, or pressure group. The use of an image that gives the impression of being a current devotional work would certainly run counter to that. I've therefore removed an image from the article. Hope everyone is all right with that. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 13:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Further, it looks as if much of the article is from the point-of-view of Sahaj Marg? If that is so, then the rules on neutrality are even more important. Articles must be completely neutral with respect to sects, teachings, cults, or religions, whatever their status. Thus "The Roman Catholic view is that the wafer is the body of Christ" is fine, but "The wafer is the body of Christ" – in Wikipedia's voice – is not. The article needs to be reworked for neutrality, not least by making it clear who believes what. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)