Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 11:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I'll give this a go. ♦ jaguar 11:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I've read through this article and am content on giving it an outright pass. It is well written, comprehensive and all the references are formatted properly. I couldn't find any issues to raise, except perhaps noticing the lead is a little on the short side, though not too short to prevent it from meeting the criteria. Good work with this one, I enjoyed reading it. ♦ jaguar 15:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply