![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article received the WikiWings award for February 2005 -- Rlandmann 13:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I think this article should be split in three parts:
1) Potez 630 (also covering 631 and other fighter projects) 2) Potez 633 (and other bomber projects) 3) Potez 63.11 (also covering 637 and other recon variants).
These three categories have almost entirely different operational careers, and were never mixed within units, so it's rather natural. Objections?
PpPachy 22:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I've dropped this article down one level for lack of inline citations.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Are there any surviving examples of this aircraft? PrussianOwl ( talk) 07:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article received the WikiWings award for February 2005 -- Rlandmann 13:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I think this article should be split in three parts:
1) Potez 630 (also covering 631 and other fighter projects) 2) Potez 633 (and other bomber projects) 3) Potez 63.11 (also covering 637 and other recon variants).
These three categories have almost entirely different operational careers, and were never mixed within units, so it's rather natural. Objections?
PpPachy 22:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I've dropped this article down one level for lack of inline citations.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 21:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Are there any surviving examples of this aircraft? PrussianOwl ( talk) 07:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)