This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
There is a dead link in the References, #17. [1]
- An active link has been found for this. ww2censor ( talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
There is also an error with Ref #18, which together with the dead link above leaves the Santa Claus section uncited.
- There are now 3 active links for this section added back in September. ww2censor ( talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- The Components of a postal code section is entirely uncited.
- The lead is a sentence or two on the short side, and could do a better job of summarising the article I think.
- This may be an artefact introduced by the various recent changes made to the cite templates, but the format of dates in the References section is now inconsistent.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 13:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sufficient work has now been done to this article to allow me to close this review as a keep. -- Malleus Fatuorum 13:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
There is a dead link in the References, #17. [1]
- An active link has been found for this. ww2censor ( talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
There is also an error with Ref #18, which together with the dead link above leaves the Santa Claus section uncited.
- There are now 3 active links for this section added back in September. ww2censor ( talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- The Components of a postal code section is entirely uncited.
- The lead is a sentence or two on the short side, and could do a better job of summarising the article I think.
- This may be an artefact introduced by the various recent changes made to the cite templates, but the format of dates in the References section is now inconsistent.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 13:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sufficient work has now been done to this article to allow me to close this review as a keep. -- Malleus Fatuorum 13:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)