This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
PostMormon Community redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2021 and 23 October 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HopeGirl2012.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey there. I wonder about the appropriateness of having so many links to the various billboards - remember, this is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement for this organization. The article already walks the thin line between information and advertisement... maybe these should be removed. A link to one of them, in-line in the article, is probably sufficient. Tan | 39 16:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rich, I hope you don't mind that I've gone ahead and made a few grammatical and spelling corrections, which you can see. Are you going to mention the hosting of Peepstone and Postmormon magazines or is that advertisement? I'm wondering if it might not be a good idea - and a fair description - to mention that Postmo often functions beyond its remit viz. Mormon concerns, as a very lively and even zany social forum often addressing personal, religious, social and philosophical questions on a more general level. And as Tan says, this is an encyclopedia article, so I think it would be wise to include what many wiki articles of this sort include, which is 'criticisms'. This may forestall any idea that it's simply an advertisement, and may dissuade anyone from putting together a 'Criticisms of Postmo' section themselves. It would show a certain forthrightness in the article from the very start, which itself would be in postmo spirit. Bamboom Bamboom2 ( talk) 21:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on PostMormon Community. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
PostMormon Community redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2021 and 23 October 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HopeGirl2012.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey there. I wonder about the appropriateness of having so many links to the various billboards - remember, this is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement for this organization. The article already walks the thin line between information and advertisement... maybe these should be removed. A link to one of them, in-line in the article, is probably sufficient. Tan | 39 16:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rich, I hope you don't mind that I've gone ahead and made a few grammatical and spelling corrections, which you can see. Are you going to mention the hosting of Peepstone and Postmormon magazines or is that advertisement? I'm wondering if it might not be a good idea - and a fair description - to mention that Postmo often functions beyond its remit viz. Mormon concerns, as a very lively and even zany social forum often addressing personal, religious, social and philosophical questions on a more general level. And as Tan says, this is an encyclopedia article, so I think it would be wise to include what many wiki articles of this sort include, which is 'criticisms'. This may forestall any idea that it's simply an advertisement, and may dissuade anyone from putting together a 'Criticisms of Postmo' section themselves. It would show a certain forthrightness in the article from the very start, which itself would be in postmo spirit. Bamboom Bamboom2 ( talk) 21:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on PostMormon Community. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)