A fact from Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2009 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in a 1986 ruling, the United States Supreme Court allowed Puerto Rico to ban legal casino advertising targeted at local residents? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/June.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gambling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Gambling To-do: history watch purge Current collaborations: Improve an article to FA Improve an article to A Help with the Gambling articles needing attention. Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{ WikiProject Gambling}} banner. The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated. Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Puerto Rico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Travel and Tourism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

One of the sources of this article was removed here with an explanation that "not a valid reference source; also has spam issues". I've asked the contributor who removed it for an explanation, here. Since he has put several hours into editing ( [1]) without response, I am restoring it for now (ala BRD) as I wait for him to have time to explain the issues with the source. -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Resolved per discussion; see User_talk:Moonriddengirl#Procon. -- Ckatz ^chat _spy 17:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply