| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Portuguese Navy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
This looks like a 5-year old wrote it. Can we fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.112.199 ( talk) 22:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
There was a ("communist"?) revolt on two portuguese warships which were planned to send to intervene in Spanish Civil War. Who knows more details? -- Roksanna ( talk) 16:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
So on some it says like “4 + 2” or “4 + 1” and I don’t understand why it’s not just 6 or 5. Faladee7 ( talk) 00:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- 4 in service, with two building and four in service with one building. It is to indicate that there are more ships on the way and that is not the final number, while not incorporating unbuilt ships into the total number. This should be explained somewhere in the article though. Llammakey ( talk) 14:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Portuguese Navy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
This looks like a 5-year old wrote it. Can we fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.112.199 ( talk) 22:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
There was a ("communist"?) revolt on two portuguese warships which were planned to send to intervene in Spanish Civil War. Who knows more details? -- Roksanna ( talk) 16:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
So on some it says like “4 + 2” or “4 + 1” and I don’t understand why it’s not just 6 or 5. Faladee7 ( talk) 00:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- 4 in service, with two building and four in service with one building. It is to indicate that there are more ships on the way and that is not the final number, while not incorporating unbuilt ships into the total number. This should be explained somewhere in the article though. Llammakey ( talk) 14:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)