![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am working on this and it should get finished in the next few days. Please be patient and don't delete it in the meantime. Thanks.
Guinnog 21:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
There we are. I think I've brought it beyond a stub now. Working on finding some good pictures. Guinnog 20:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Punkmorten (or anybody else!), I am of the opinion that:
Copyright Notice This portal under the addresses “ http://www.forçaaérea.pt” and “ http://www.emfa.pt” is property of the Portuguese Air Force. All the materials contained herein, including videos, graphics, texts, images, drawings, music, sounds and any other type of information are property of the Portuguese Air Force or were included with the permission of the entities that have the respective copyrights, being thus protected by copyrights and similar, Industrial Property Rights, under the Portuguese Laws, E.C. Laws and all International agreements and conventions signed by Portugal, and, therefore, the material can only be used under the conditions of this Portal. You may freely copy, download or use part or the totality of the material contained herein for personal or public use, provided you do not have any commercial or offensive purpose. You must, however, refer your source. Regarding the sites linked to the Portal, you should get permission from the authors or refer the source, according to the respective copyright notices.
at http://www.emfa.pt/www/avisos.php?lang=ing
gives me the right to post images here so long as they are credited.
Would I be right or wrong?
I'm going to post one anyway as it needs an image; maybe you can advise me if I've misunderstood.
I'm working on a version of the national insignia and should get it done tonight or tomorrow. I'm only learning Illustrator!
Thanks Guinnog 22:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Units, formations, and bases[edit] Shortcuts: WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME WP:MILMOS#BASENAME An article about a unit, formation, or base should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". The name should generally be either the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit or base belongs; or, in cases where no relevant formal name exists or where a formal name is not commonly employed by historians, the most common name used in historical literature.
from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Military history#Units, formations, and bases
Therefore all units and bases should be in Portuguese primarily a la:
Esquadra 81 - (81 squadron) or possibly Esquadra 81 - (81 squadron)
-- Petebutt ( talk) 23:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
I have reverted the name of the article back to English as I cant see any reason why a non-English term should be used. Raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history for sanity check, thanks. MilborneOne ( talk) 12:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
The article's Current inventory of aircraft section has incorrect data from Flightglobal's World Air Forces. I recommend that multiple sources be always used when possible for aircraft inventories and that the data is cross-checked.
Best regards, Get_It ( talk) 01:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Data from Flightglobal's World Air Forces is once again being strictly used as a sole source for the aircraft section, thus leading to the removal of also sourced content and the addition of aircraft not in service and "on order". I have to disagree with only Flightglobal being used as a source and with the inclusion of aircraft "on order" as per the arguments given on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 155#RfC: Aircraft inventory table on air force pages. Best regards, Get_It ( talk) 07:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Portuguese Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Portuguese Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Below is comparison on information on Portuguese Air Force (PAF), WAF, scramble.nl and other source:
PAF page
WAF 2020/2019
WAF 2018/2017
scramble.nl (per 16 April 2020)
other source
Can we agree that total number of PAF's P-3C is 5 and C-130 is 5? Ckfasdf ( talk) 04:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am working on this and it should get finished in the next few days. Please be patient and don't delete it in the meantime. Thanks.
Guinnog 21:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
There we are. I think I've brought it beyond a stub now. Working on finding some good pictures. Guinnog 20:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Punkmorten (or anybody else!), I am of the opinion that:
Copyright Notice This portal under the addresses “ http://www.forçaaérea.pt” and “ http://www.emfa.pt” is property of the Portuguese Air Force. All the materials contained herein, including videos, graphics, texts, images, drawings, music, sounds and any other type of information are property of the Portuguese Air Force or were included with the permission of the entities that have the respective copyrights, being thus protected by copyrights and similar, Industrial Property Rights, under the Portuguese Laws, E.C. Laws and all International agreements and conventions signed by Portugal, and, therefore, the material can only be used under the conditions of this Portal. You may freely copy, download or use part or the totality of the material contained herein for personal or public use, provided you do not have any commercial or offensive purpose. You must, however, refer your source. Regarding the sites linked to the Portal, you should get permission from the authors or refer the source, according to the respective copyright notices.
at http://www.emfa.pt/www/avisos.php?lang=ing
gives me the right to post images here so long as they are credited.
Would I be right or wrong?
I'm going to post one anyway as it needs an image; maybe you can advise me if I've misunderstood.
I'm working on a version of the national insignia and should get it done tonight or tomorrow. I'm only learning Illustrator!
Thanks Guinnog 22:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Units, formations, and bases[edit] Shortcuts: WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME WP:MILMOS#BASENAME An article about a unit, formation, or base should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". The name should generally be either the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit or base belongs; or, in cases where no relevant formal name exists or where a formal name is not commonly employed by historians, the most common name used in historical literature.
from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Military history#Units, formations, and bases
Therefore all units and bases should be in Portuguese primarily a la:
Esquadra 81 - (81 squadron) or possibly Esquadra 81 - (81 squadron)
-- Petebutt ( talk) 23:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
I have reverted the name of the article back to English as I cant see any reason why a non-English term should be used. Raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history for sanity check, thanks. MilborneOne ( talk) 12:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
The article's Current inventory of aircraft section has incorrect data from Flightglobal's World Air Forces. I recommend that multiple sources be always used when possible for aircraft inventories and that the data is cross-checked.
Best regards, Get_It ( talk) 01:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Data from Flightglobal's World Air Forces is once again being strictly used as a sole source for the aircraft section, thus leading to the removal of also sourced content and the addition of aircraft not in service and "on order". I have to disagree with only Flightglobal being used as a source and with the inclusion of aircraft "on order" as per the arguments given on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 155#RfC: Aircraft inventory table on air force pages. Best regards, Get_It ( talk) 07:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Portuguese Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Portuguese Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Below is comparison on information on Portuguese Air Force (PAF), WAF, scramble.nl and other source:
PAF page
WAF 2020/2019
WAF 2018/2017
scramble.nl (per 16 April 2020)
other source
Can we agree that total number of PAF's P-3C is 5 and C-130 is 5? Ckfasdf ( talk) 04:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)