This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think the highest this is "Mid". Why top? Katr67 ( talk) 23:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
This article has had a GA review, and was successfully promoted to WP:GA-quality. The GA subpage for the archived review is here. Cirt ( talk) 09:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I think the recent edits were done in good faith and weren't vandalism. The editor who was reverted provided a link to a citation on his/her talk page, which was later deleted for some reason. If that was added here, and hopefully someone can help with the citation format because it's not easy for new editors to figure out, that should be sufficient. I imagine there is a bit of a learning curve around here in terms of "What part of 'I work there, I should know' don't you understand?!" Let's all be mindful of article ownership issues as well. Thanks. Katr67 ( talk) 20:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
This page is currently being updated by the staff of Portland Monthly magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdenies ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I've removed the conflict of interest editing.
Please post here to the talk page with suggestions if you have a WP:COI, and don't edit the article directly.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 10:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
This article in its WP:GA quality state relies upon secondary sources, and NOT primary sources.
Please let's keep it to secondary sources that are independent of the article's subject itself.
Thank you,
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think the highest this is "Mid". Why top? Katr67 ( talk) 23:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
This article has had a GA review, and was successfully promoted to WP:GA-quality. The GA subpage for the archived review is here. Cirt ( talk) 09:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I think the recent edits were done in good faith and weren't vandalism. The editor who was reverted provided a link to a citation on his/her talk page, which was later deleted for some reason. If that was added here, and hopefully someone can help with the citation format because it's not easy for new editors to figure out, that should be sufficient. I imagine there is a bit of a learning curve around here in terms of "What part of 'I work there, I should know' don't you understand?!" Let's all be mindful of article ownership issues as well. Thanks. Katr67 ( talk) 20:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
This page is currently being updated by the staff of Portland Monthly magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdenies ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I've removed the conflict of interest editing.
Please post here to the talk page with suggestions if you have a WP:COI, and don't edit the article directly.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 10:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
This article in its WP:GA quality state relies upon secondary sources, and NOT primary sources.
Please let's keep it to secondary sources that are independent of the article's subject itself.
Thank you,