![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:HBLR 2011 leaves Port Imperial.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
I don't see why this is one article not two. The HBLR station is named for the ferry terminal but it not directly adjacent, and has a (rather wide) major roadway (Port Imperial Boulevard) and multiple buildings between them. One can't even see the ferry terminal from the HBLR station anymore. They're really separate facilities. I think the articles should be split.
(At the very least, I don't see any evidence that this title is actually the COMMONNAME. The HBLR station is named just "Port Imperial", while the actual ferry terminal is called "Port Imperial / Weehawken" by NY Waterway. The article title is made up and inappropriate.) oknazevad ( talk) 00:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The article best colletively describes the facilities at the transit hub, which would repetitive/redundant if split. A change with redirect could be Port Imperial (Weehawken); Port Imperial – Weehawken; or Port Imperial, Weehawken (?). Djflem ( talk) 21:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:HBLR 2011 leaves Port Imperial.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
I don't see why this is one article not two. The HBLR station is named for the ferry terminal but it not directly adjacent, and has a (rather wide) major roadway (Port Imperial Boulevard) and multiple buildings between them. One can't even see the ferry terminal from the HBLR station anymore. They're really separate facilities. I think the articles should be split.
(At the very least, I don't see any evidence that this title is actually the COMMONNAME. The HBLR station is named just "Port Imperial", while the actual ferry terminal is called "Port Imperial / Weehawken" by NY Waterway. The article title is made up and inappropriate.) oknazevad ( talk) 00:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The article best colletively describes the facilities at the transit hub, which would repetitive/redundant if split. A change with redirect could be Port Imperial (Weehawken); Port Imperial – Weehawken; or Port Imperial, Weehawken (?). Djflem ( talk) 21:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)