This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Port Howard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of the settlement be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the Falkland Islands may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Attractions include a ford ? - or should that be fort ? 213.51.209.230 10:45, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There are different statements about the flag on the coffin - the other article Engagement at Many Branch Point says there was no Union Jack -- Eingangskontrolle ( talk) 20:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Port Howard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.infanteria.ejercito.mil.ar/nueva/unidades/RegimientodeInfanteriaMecanizado5/caidos.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm reverting a revert. I tried the reverter's talk page, but it says he's no longer a user [Ed.: See next post, where I clarified what I saw on the talk page and both admitted and explained my error. Despite my error, I used the article's talk page and pinged WCM and provided a full explanation and cited authoritative sources; there's no requirement to additionally post on a user's page.]. I changed the expansion of NGSFO from title case to sentence case. Many people are confused on this point: Just because something makes an acronym, the thing itself is NOT capitalized unless it is a proper noun. The expansion does NOT get capitalized. This is a common example of over-capitalization of terminology that is specific to an industry or subject of study (e.g., military, business)—people who are embedded in those communities tend to capitalize terms that are important to their fields, often terms that have acronyms or initialisms made out of them. (Edit for emphasis: See WP:EXPABBR, which is pretty definitive on the issue at hand.) Holy ( talk) 20:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes W C M email 12:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Port Howard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of the settlement be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the Falkland Islands may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Attractions include a ford ? - or should that be fort ? 213.51.209.230 10:45, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There are different statements about the flag on the coffin - the other article Engagement at Many Branch Point says there was no Union Jack -- Eingangskontrolle ( talk) 20:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Port Howard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.infanteria.ejercito.mil.ar/nueva/unidades/RegimientodeInfanteriaMecanizado5/caidos.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm reverting a revert. I tried the reverter's talk page, but it says he's no longer a user [Ed.: See next post, where I clarified what I saw on the talk page and both admitted and explained my error. Despite my error, I used the article's talk page and pinged WCM and provided a full explanation and cited authoritative sources; there's no requirement to additionally post on a user's page.]. I changed the expansion of NGSFO from title case to sentence case. Many people are confused on this point: Just because something makes an acronym, the thing itself is NOT capitalized unless it is a proper noun. The expansion does NOT get capitalized. This is a common example of over-capitalization of terminology that is specific to an industry or subject of study (e.g., military, business)—people who are embedded in those communities tend to capitalize terms that are important to their fields, often terms that have acronyms or initialisms made out of them. (Edit for emphasis: See WP:EXPABBR, which is pretty definitive on the issue at hand.) Holy ( talk) 20:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes W C M email 12:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)