This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that this excerpt is not particularly NPOV:
"Thus, finally, the occupant of the Apostolic See at the right moment maintained with all authority the traditional dogma of the Church, and protected the truth of the Church against error."
Sounds like this comes from a book of Catholic "propaganda" (it's a direct quote from the old Catholic Encyclopedia article, in fact)
I've not changed it yet myself, but perhaps more experienced wikipedians might get involved? -- sk4p 23 jan 2006
This article is very roman-catholic centric -zosimus is venerated as a saint in the eastern and oriental orthodox churches as well (and probably via history, in the anglican and lutheran churches, etc) , and not mentioned as such here - similarly the use of an unqualified 'pope' title (e.g. do you mean 'patriarch of rome' or 'leader of the entire church') is contentious given the continued great schism and its relation to roman catholic claims of papal supremacy. I'd expect something more like Saint_Peter with church-neutral historical content, and a separate by-church tradition sections for this to be a 'proper' article. See also: http://orthodoxwiki.org/Zosimus_of_Rome and http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/cce/id/1955/rec/2025 , etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.119.86.136 ( talk) 03:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
This article with the Catholic Encyclopaedia (1913) state, that Zosimus died on 27th December, but many other wikis (de, fr, cs) and Encyclopædia Britannica state that he died on 26th December. Should be clarified. -- Silesianus ( talk) 12:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that this excerpt is not particularly NPOV:
"Thus, finally, the occupant of the Apostolic See at the right moment maintained with all authority the traditional dogma of the Church, and protected the truth of the Church against error."
Sounds like this comes from a book of Catholic "propaganda" (it's a direct quote from the old Catholic Encyclopedia article, in fact)
I've not changed it yet myself, but perhaps more experienced wikipedians might get involved? -- sk4p 23 jan 2006
This article is very roman-catholic centric -zosimus is venerated as a saint in the eastern and oriental orthodox churches as well (and probably via history, in the anglican and lutheran churches, etc) , and not mentioned as such here - similarly the use of an unqualified 'pope' title (e.g. do you mean 'patriarch of rome' or 'leader of the entire church') is contentious given the continued great schism and its relation to roman catholic claims of papal supremacy. I'd expect something more like Saint_Peter with church-neutral historical content, and a separate by-church tradition sections for this to be a 'proper' article. See also: http://orthodoxwiki.org/Zosimus_of_Rome and http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/cce/id/1955/rec/2025 , etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.119.86.136 ( talk) 03:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
This article with the Catholic Encyclopaedia (1913) state, that Zosimus died on 27th December, but many other wikis (de, fr, cs) and Encyclopædia Britannica state that he died on 26th December. Should be clarified. -- Silesianus ( talk) 12:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)