![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The IP user 70.94.246.15 recently changed the phrasing in the section on the seperation of powers and balence of powers. I'm not personally a big fan of either phrasing, as both could be argued to support a certain perspective, but before I try to write it myself, I'm curious if anyone has any opinions on whether either phrasing is good or presents a neutral point of view, Thanks — The Editor's Apprentice ( Talk• Edits) 03:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
The health care policies are mentioned in the paragraph "economic policies". Education, on the other hand, in the paragraph "social policies". I'd reckon, health care is more social than economical. Anyway, it would deserve a separate paragraph or subparagraph instead of being part of the economic text block. Opzwartbeek ( talk) 07:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Opzwartbeek: I tried to create a health care subsection and move education to the "economic policy" section, but someone reverted my edit for no reason Spiritoftheeast1993 ( talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
All information in the LGBT issues part of the artical is about LGB issues. If it is possible, add some information about Republican positions concerning transgender people. Reprarina ( talk) 20:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This article has a lot of unreferenced claims and generalizations about the Republican Party and its philosophies on liberty, so much so that it would seem to be wholly written by Democrats. As such the article has a very big problem with neutrality. In the least major claims should be referenced so it's possible to understand where the claims originate from. -- 2A04:981:2B00:4C00:A1AD:3698:AE1:679E ( talk) 11:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is a mess. I think we should group the issues into social, economic, legal, and foreign policy sections just like on the page Political positions of the Democratic Party. On that page labor unions, environment, and trade are subsections under the "economic policy" section, immigration is under the "social policy" section, and international relations with other countries is under the "foreign policy" section. We should do likewise for this page. I tried to reorganize the sections earlier, but someone reverted my edits for no reason. Spiritoftheeast1993 ( talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
the description of the Republican party platform is what they SAID they believed in until Trump! Since Trump, their ENTIRE platform is whatever he says it is! 73.27.142.221 ( talk) 02:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Not done - see
WP:NPOV.
Bettering the Wiki (
talk) 03:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Political positions of the Democratic Party which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 02:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The IP user 70.94.246.15 recently changed the phrasing in the section on the seperation of powers and balence of powers. I'm not personally a big fan of either phrasing, as both could be argued to support a certain perspective, but before I try to write it myself, I'm curious if anyone has any opinions on whether either phrasing is good or presents a neutral point of view, Thanks — The Editor's Apprentice ( Talk• Edits) 03:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
The health care policies are mentioned in the paragraph "economic policies". Education, on the other hand, in the paragraph "social policies". I'd reckon, health care is more social than economical. Anyway, it would deserve a separate paragraph or subparagraph instead of being part of the economic text block. Opzwartbeek ( talk) 07:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Opzwartbeek: I tried to create a health care subsection and move education to the "economic policy" section, but someone reverted my edit for no reason Spiritoftheeast1993 ( talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
All information in the LGBT issues part of the artical is about LGB issues. If it is possible, add some information about Republican positions concerning transgender people. Reprarina ( talk) 20:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This article has a lot of unreferenced claims and generalizations about the Republican Party and its philosophies on liberty, so much so that it would seem to be wholly written by Democrats. As such the article has a very big problem with neutrality. In the least major claims should be referenced so it's possible to understand where the claims originate from. -- 2A04:981:2B00:4C00:A1AD:3698:AE1:679E ( talk) 11:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is a mess. I think we should group the issues into social, economic, legal, and foreign policy sections just like on the page Political positions of the Democratic Party. On that page labor unions, environment, and trade are subsections under the "economic policy" section, immigration is under the "social policy" section, and international relations with other countries is under the "foreign policy" section. We should do likewise for this page. I tried to reorganize the sections earlier, but someone reverted my edits for no reason. Spiritoftheeast1993 ( talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
the description of the Republican party platform is what they SAID they believed in until Trump! Since Trump, their ENTIRE platform is whatever he says it is! 73.27.142.221 ( talk) 02:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Not done - see
WP:NPOV.
Bettering the Wiki (
talk) 03:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Political positions of the Democratic Party which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 02:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)