This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Political positions of Ron DeSantis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "auto2":
Reference named "auto1":
As waves of refugees from Syria converged on Europe this summer, law enforcement authorities feared this scenario: That terrorist operatives would slip in among the multitudes [...] Last week's attacks on France may have validated some of those fears. At least three of the seven known attackers and the suspected ringleader, Abdelhamid Abaaoud [...] are thought to have crossed clandestinely from Syria into Europe.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I removed @ Jenny Death's "right wing populist" addition. This came up on Ron DeSantis [1], but I would lean towards WP:REDFLAG. I don't doubt some have called DeSantis a populist, but multiple, high quality sources are needed to justify inclusion. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 19:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
I would encourage editors to consider moving DeSantis' cultural views and material related to the "war on woke" as phrased by some outlets into its own section. Presently, the article potentially gives too much weight to foreign relations in making it a Level 2 heading while sorting every other domestic event into its own level 2 header and subsequently making major domestic issues level 3 over level 2. It may also be necessary to split part of the article into Social policy of Ron DeSantis if necessary. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 00:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Looks like we could use a section on Social Security and Medicare. Here are a couple potential sources:
Anythingyouwant ( talk) 04:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
His removal of sourced content on DeSantis' very noteworthy atitudes to LGBT rights is nothing but arbitrary and is an obvious case of POV warring. Peleio Aquiles ( talk) 19:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
And it wasn't you.Weird thing to argue about when there's an audit history of the article. [5] All beside the point anyway, please summarize the section to include the information if you believe it should be included. Do it any way you see fit. Continually adding information to an overlay long sections simply because there's a source isn't how summarizing works either. If the policy was to include every single reliably sourced piece of information about Ron DeSantis this article would go on forever. If you're unwilling to do so then there's no point in continuing this discussion. Thanks. Nemov ( talk) 15:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Getting back to the subject of this section, it appears to me that the DeSantis political position amid the Bud Light controversy has received so much coverage that it's well-deserving of its own paragraph. Removal does seem to smack of white-washing. An article on "political positions" doesn't have to be limited to just specific policies. Even if it did, DeSantis' policies on LGBTQ issues have also had much coverage, and the Bud Light case is one of the most prominent, probably even top-2, along with the drag queen policies. Wes sideman ( talk) 12:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I agree that the content is notable for inclusion given the significant coverage in reliable sources. As has been stated, removing content outright is not summarization. The argument for summarization is a weak one anyway given the article is within readable prose size at 6,363 words. –– FormalDude (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Political positions of Ron DeSantis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "auto2":
Reference named "auto1":
As waves of refugees from Syria converged on Europe this summer, law enforcement authorities feared this scenario: That terrorist operatives would slip in among the multitudes [...] Last week's attacks on France may have validated some of those fears. At least three of the seven known attackers and the suspected ringleader, Abdelhamid Abaaoud [...] are thought to have crossed clandestinely from Syria into Europe.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I removed @ Jenny Death's "right wing populist" addition. This came up on Ron DeSantis [1], but I would lean towards WP:REDFLAG. I don't doubt some have called DeSantis a populist, but multiple, high quality sources are needed to justify inclusion. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 19:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
I would encourage editors to consider moving DeSantis' cultural views and material related to the "war on woke" as phrased by some outlets into its own section. Presently, the article potentially gives too much weight to foreign relations in making it a Level 2 heading while sorting every other domestic event into its own level 2 header and subsequently making major domestic issues level 3 over level 2. It may also be necessary to split part of the article into Social policy of Ron DeSantis if necessary. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 00:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Looks like we could use a section on Social Security and Medicare. Here are a couple potential sources:
Anythingyouwant ( talk) 04:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
His removal of sourced content on DeSantis' very noteworthy atitudes to LGBT rights is nothing but arbitrary and is an obvious case of POV warring. Peleio Aquiles ( talk) 19:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
And it wasn't you.Weird thing to argue about when there's an audit history of the article. [5] All beside the point anyway, please summarize the section to include the information if you believe it should be included. Do it any way you see fit. Continually adding information to an overlay long sections simply because there's a source isn't how summarizing works either. If the policy was to include every single reliably sourced piece of information about Ron DeSantis this article would go on forever. If you're unwilling to do so then there's no point in continuing this discussion. Thanks. Nemov ( talk) 15:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Getting back to the subject of this section, it appears to me that the DeSantis political position amid the Bud Light controversy has received so much coverage that it's well-deserving of its own paragraph. Removal does seem to smack of white-washing. An article on "political positions" doesn't have to be limited to just specific policies. Even if it did, DeSantis' policies on LGBTQ issues have also had much coverage, and the Bud Light case is one of the most prominent, probably even top-2, along with the drag queen policies. Wes sideman ( talk) 12:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I agree that the content is notable for inclusion given the significant coverage in reliable sources. As has been stated, removing content outright is not summarization. The argument for summarization is a weak one anyway given the article is within readable prose size at 6,363 words. –– FormalDude (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)