![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was at [[Politcal Soldier]]. Political was spelled incorrectly. I have moved the page. - iHoshie 10:46, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
I have once again removed this improper characterization. Here are a few relevant quotes:
"As we have seen, Julius Evola, who might conceivably be counted among them--was not a "fascist" thinker in any meaningful sense of the term. He himself, both implicitly and explicitly, rejected such a characterization. That he remains identified as a fascist thinker by many contemporary commentators tells us more about contemporary discussions than it does about Fascism." Mussolini's intellectuals: fascist social and political thought p. 250
"Whomever he influenced, he influenced them with doctrines that could only be characterized as "Traditional"--certainly not Fascist." "Evola was not a Fascist thinker, so it would be hard to imagine that his ideas might be "quintessentially" Fascist." The search for neofascism p.108
"Whatever the influence of Evola on the antidemocratic thought of Western and Eastern Europe, it cannot be classified as 'fascist' or 'neofascist'" It is at best an expression of that traditional reactionary thought found among those thinkers who, in the first years of the nineteenth century, sought the restoration of a Europe that preceded the French Revolution--or, preferably, a world that preceded the Renaissance. None of this tells us anything about Fascism. Fascism: The nature of fascism p.340 Posted by Pollinosisss 15:35, 2 January 2010
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Political Soldier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was at [[Politcal Soldier]]. Political was spelled incorrectly. I have moved the page. - iHoshie 10:46, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
I have once again removed this improper characterization. Here are a few relevant quotes:
"As we have seen, Julius Evola, who might conceivably be counted among them--was not a "fascist" thinker in any meaningful sense of the term. He himself, both implicitly and explicitly, rejected such a characterization. That he remains identified as a fascist thinker by many contemporary commentators tells us more about contemporary discussions than it does about Fascism." Mussolini's intellectuals: fascist social and political thought p. 250
"Whomever he influenced, he influenced them with doctrines that could only be characterized as "Traditional"--certainly not Fascist." "Evola was not a Fascist thinker, so it would be hard to imagine that his ideas might be "quintessentially" Fascist." The search for neofascism p.108
"Whatever the influence of Evola on the antidemocratic thought of Western and Eastern Europe, it cannot be classified as 'fascist' or 'neofascist'" It is at best an expression of that traditional reactionary thought found among those thinkers who, in the first years of the nineteenth century, sought the restoration of a Europe that preceded the French Revolution--or, preferably, a world that preceded the Renaissance. None of this tells us anything about Fascism. Fascism: The nature of fascism p.340 Posted by Pollinosisss 15:35, 2 January 2010
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Political Soldier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)