From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
MWright96 (
talk ·
contribs)
20:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
reply
Will be reviewing this article as part of the
GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020.
MWright96
(talk)
20:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
reply
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists): ![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects):
b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
- The lead is on the short side. Please expand it to cover the other major points mentioned in the article
Background
- "During The Troubles, they had been accused" - by whom?
- "when going through Parliament.[6][2]" - refs in numerical order please
Name of the force
- The acronyms of Police Service of Northern Ireland should be in brackets on the first instance of its mentioning
- "Following Conservative Party pressure," - how about Following pressure from the
Conservative Party instead?
Recruitment
- "It stated that the force's size should be reduced by 4,500 officers." - why was this the case?
- "the Royal Ulster Constabulary had a 9–1" - the hyphen should be a en dash per
MOS:DASH
- The % symbol is better off written as per cent per
MOS:PERCENT
- The acronyms of the Gaelic Athletic Association should be in brackets
References
- References 5, 7, 18, 19, 21 and 22 are missing the publication date
- Reference 10 is missing the second author of the article
- References 13 and 21 are missing the author(s) of the pieces
- The publication date for Reference 20 is incorrect
Am going to put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above.
MWright96
(talk)
12:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
reply