Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 ( talk · contribs) 21:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk) 21:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Comments

I have fixed one minor issue within the article. Other than that, nothing else needs to be fixed.-- Dom497 ( talk) 21:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Wow, that was quick! Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC) reply