Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has become the center of an edit war between two editors, thus no longer meets GA criterion 5 for stability.
Vicenarian (
talk)
18:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment: Edit war is being done under a silly pretext. User:Smanu is deleting information from the article and replacing with unreliable sources and information which doesnot support verifiability. When reverted, this war started. A discussion has been opened on the talk page. I'm sure a consensus will be reached among other editors regarding why is he vandalising the page. He has already been pointed out about this, but instead chose to say such comments as I'm right and you're wrong, bad-mouthing my name etc etc. Looking at his contributions, it is known that he engages in these kind of edit wars in other articles also. It seems like he doesnot like anybody else to revert his fancrufty changes. I believe the article's status should be maintained. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, instead of keeping this open, I'm going to go ahead and close it out, as there is strong opposition to delisting and I don't think a community reassessment is warranted. The GA listing will be kept. Vicenarian ( talk) 17:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has become the center of an edit war between two editors, thus no longer meets GA criterion 5 for stability.
Vicenarian (
talk)
18:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment: Edit war is being done under a silly pretext. User:Smanu is deleting information from the article and replacing with unreliable sources and information which doesnot support verifiability. When reverted, this war started. A discussion has been opened on the talk page. I'm sure a consensus will be reached among other editors regarding why is he vandalising the page. He has already been pointed out about this, but instead chose to say such comments as I'm right and you're wrong, bad-mouthing my name etc etc. Looking at his contributions, it is known that he engages in these kind of edit wars in other articles also. It seems like he doesnot like anybody else to revert his fancrufty changes. I believe the article's status should be maintained. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, instead of keeping this open, I'm going to go ahead and close it out, as there is strong opposition to delisting and I don't think a community reassessment is warranted. The GA listing will be kept. Vicenarian ( talk) 17:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)