This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Game theory High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in | Fix a red link | Add content | Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Mathematics Low‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums Stub‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Hi @ David Eppstein! I see you've been on a roll editing social choice articles the past few weeks. Do you happen to know much game theory?

From my very limited knowledge, this article seems like it covers a very important topic in voting, but does so quite poorly (because honestly, I don't know much about game theory unfortunately). These sorts of tie-breaking vote models seem to be how most social choice theorists model strategic voting, though, so I think they're important and deserve something better. Do you have any suggestions or thoughts on improvement?

Thanks! :) Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 01:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply