This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
PhilOSophocle, links to car ads posted on the internet are not citations. Please read WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:RS to get up to speed on the article standards you're having trouble understanding. In the meantime, please stop making this edit to the Barracuda article; your behaviour is verging on vandalism. Until an acceptable source can be provided for the assertion, the tag needs to stay. — Scheinwerfermann T· C04:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
This is really funny - now you're bringing in help! OK, I've had enough of this, so I'll let you win this little one - leave the personal comments about me which have nothing to do with the article, but that's ironic for a person who quotes WP policy in virtually every post. - PhilOSophocle ( talk) 17:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Both the 106-inch and 108-inch wheelbases are described as "2700 mm". This is obviously not correct. However, since even 106 inches are not exactly 2700 mm (but rather 2692.4) I don't know what the correct metric length for the 108 inches is. Or should there simply be direct conversions (2692.4 and 2743.2, respectively)? Maribert ( talk) 22:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
As it seems, there exist a number of late 1969 A-body Barracudas that have already a split grille instead of the clearly divided front, and thus resemble far more the 1970 E-body models. Could someone who knows more about that subject please add an explanation? 213.166.53.176 ( talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Go to arl.lu and look at my reference in the guestbook (9th july) about a photograph posted on the same page. The administrator refers to the car shown on this picture as an end of line Barracuda from 1969. Up to that moment, I thought it was customized. I would load up my shot from the picture if I knew how. 213.166.53.122 ( talk) 16:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanx for the information. My intent was not to spread false information but to have the one I got confirmed or, as is the case, corrected. Therefore also the question mark in the title. The car on your picture is definitely of the same type as the car on that website. I´ll accept it is NOT a Barracuda and will start learning about the Dodge Demon ... 213.166.53.120 ( talk) 19:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe the questioner is talking about a Limited Edition 1969 Barracuda called the "Savage GT". See the following link for more discussion: http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/showthread.php?t=87660 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.101.127.30 ( talk) 17:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
How rare is this car? it is a #'s v-8 w/ push button automatic. A barn find complete car no rust, and 80 K miles. An AZ car.
New Cuda guy
New Cuda guy (
talk) 18:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Plymouth Barracuda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The sentence about the TorqueFlite shift bushbuttons being phased out for 1965 contains a link to the TorqueFlite article, which says in one of the first few paragraphs: "The buttons were replaced by conventional steering column- or floor-mounted shift levers in all automatic Chrysler-built vehicles for the 1965 model year, though floor levers were available in certain sporty 1964 models." Funnily enough, in that article this tidbit isn't separately cited; at least it has no "[1]" footnote marker. Surely if it needed to be cited anywhere, it would be there?
At the risk of starting another Scheinwerferguy vs PhiloSophocle-type flamewar, it does feel rather "anal" to have "[citation needed]" here. -- CRConrad ( talk) 10:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
PhilOSophocle, links to car ads posted on the internet are not citations. Please read WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:RS to get up to speed on the article standards you're having trouble understanding. In the meantime, please stop making this edit to the Barracuda article; your behaviour is verging on vandalism. Until an acceptable source can be provided for the assertion, the tag needs to stay. — Scheinwerfermann T· C04:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
This is really funny - now you're bringing in help! OK, I've had enough of this, so I'll let you win this little one - leave the personal comments about me which have nothing to do with the article, but that's ironic for a person who quotes WP policy in virtually every post. - PhilOSophocle ( talk) 17:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Both the 106-inch and 108-inch wheelbases are described as "2700 mm". This is obviously not correct. However, since even 106 inches are not exactly 2700 mm (but rather 2692.4) I don't know what the correct metric length for the 108 inches is. Or should there simply be direct conversions (2692.4 and 2743.2, respectively)? Maribert ( talk) 22:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
As it seems, there exist a number of late 1969 A-body Barracudas that have already a split grille instead of the clearly divided front, and thus resemble far more the 1970 E-body models. Could someone who knows more about that subject please add an explanation? 213.166.53.176 ( talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Go to arl.lu and look at my reference in the guestbook (9th july) about a photograph posted on the same page. The administrator refers to the car shown on this picture as an end of line Barracuda from 1969. Up to that moment, I thought it was customized. I would load up my shot from the picture if I knew how. 213.166.53.122 ( talk) 16:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanx for the information. My intent was not to spread false information but to have the one I got confirmed or, as is the case, corrected. Therefore also the question mark in the title. The car on your picture is definitely of the same type as the car on that website. I´ll accept it is NOT a Barracuda and will start learning about the Dodge Demon ... 213.166.53.120 ( talk) 19:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe the questioner is talking about a Limited Edition 1969 Barracuda called the "Savage GT". See the following link for more discussion: http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/showthread.php?t=87660 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.101.127.30 ( talk) 17:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
How rare is this car? it is a #'s v-8 w/ push button automatic. A barn find complete car no rust, and 80 K miles. An AZ car.
New Cuda guy
New Cuda guy (
talk) 18:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Plymouth Barracuda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The sentence about the TorqueFlite shift bushbuttons being phased out for 1965 contains a link to the TorqueFlite article, which says in one of the first few paragraphs: "The buttons were replaced by conventional steering column- or floor-mounted shift levers in all automatic Chrysler-built vehicles for the 1965 model year, though floor levers were available in certain sporty 1964 models." Funnily enough, in that article this tidbit isn't separately cited; at least it has no "[1]" footnote marker. Surely if it needed to be cited anywhere, it would be there?
At the risk of starting another Scheinwerferguy vs PhiloSophocle-type flamewar, it does feel rather "anal" to have "[citation needed]" here. -- CRConrad ( talk) 10:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)