![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to University_of_Central_Lancashire#Students.27_Union. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure what citations are required other than the periodical, "Pluto" itself? To which the entry refers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzyjonty ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Ah of course, how careless of me, I'll drop the current Editor a line to try and obtain a reference for that statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzyjonty ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
I have now added a reference for the problem expressed above. Joebloggsy ( talk) 15:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Can we have some clarity beyond Peter E James's constant reversions as to whether the info on Matt Tucker should be deleted or not? I met him and he was EXACTLY as described in the deleted paragraph (which I didn't write but is pants wettingly funny not to mention accurate).
-- 195.225.189.243 ( talk) 13:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree with the removal as it's unprovable. However having met Matt myself I agree with the above statement. He was (and probably still is) a bastard.
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to University_of_Central_Lancashire#Students.27_Union. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure what citations are required other than the periodical, "Pluto" itself? To which the entry refers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzyjonty ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Ah of course, how careless of me, I'll drop the current Editor a line to try and obtain a reference for that statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzyjonty ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
I have now added a reference for the problem expressed above. Joebloggsy ( talk) 15:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Can we have some clarity beyond Peter E James's constant reversions as to whether the info on Matt Tucker should be deleted or not? I met him and he was EXACTLY as described in the deleted paragraph (which I didn't write but is pants wettingly funny not to mention accurate).
-- 195.225.189.243 ( talk) 13:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree with the removal as it's unprovable. However having met Matt myself I agree with the above statement. He was (and probably still is) a bastard.