This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Plastination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I went to http://www.amazinghumanbody.com.au/ yesterday, quite cool. It uses the plastination technique, but does not seem to be related to the original inventor in any way.
Also, there's a slightly different process on display there, called tubular casts or some such, where a resin is injected into the veins/arteries of a limb or organ, then the surrounding flesh removed. Is this still plastination or is it some separate process?
cheers, Clinton.
http://tvnewswatch.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/rumours-persist-following-gu-kailai.html 47.60.67.17 ( talk) 10:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Proponents for the increased respect and courtesey for the human body point out that the inventors went ahead with the institute without due consideration to alretnative non intrusive methods of anatomy illustration such as digital computer rendered simulation. Computer simulation of the human body would alow much closer and detailed analysis of the human body. Zoom in, see through and body position maneuverability could allow a digitally simulated model much greater detail and content than a physical model ever could. Redistributing the simulations in the form of software over the internet, could further accomplish a broader viewer base and through a much more flexible means without ever requiring the use of bodies. Because of the versatility of software and the development of computer technology today, a virtual model is not only vastly supperior and more available to viewers world wide, but also an opportunity for further scientific development. The lack of a free, open source, world wide online available simulation while continuation of plastination, is not only unscientific, but also disrespectfull to the human body. -Written without signing by User:Nadyes
What controversy? This is apparently written by someone who knows hardly anything. At least for the coming 100years plastination won`t be replaceable by any other technique and even then only partially. Besides not everyone is a religious fundamentalist and believes that throwing a stone is disrespectful or likewise using dead carcasses with complete anonymity. Besides what you said gotta be the stupiest thing i heard in a year or so. CT is used because it can be performed in a live individual but it will never not even close exceed an actual cutting tomography. Theoretically not possible and there are worlds in between. Yes Plastination also enabled cutting tomography. I can savely claim that plastination will be used for the next several hundreds of years. Slicky 15:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Someone should consider seperating criticisms out of the main article (see step seven) ... and this is a kinda one sided argument article. 69.158.59.78 14:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The article makes no mention of the history of allegations that the Chinese government has sold the bodies of political prisoners for use in plastination. This subject has received news coverage, is the subject of legislation, and deserves coverage here. 21:27, October 31, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.203.88.125 ( talk) 19:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The link to "List of US patents by Gunther von Hagens" seems to be dead, but I would rather someone replace it than just remove it, as the subject seems fairly interesting.
The last paragraph of the main section was poorly written, unencyclopedic, and completely POV. I removed the whole thing, as it contributed nothing to the article and made it read like a junior high school paper. DrExtreme 21:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm tagging this article with wp:coi and wp:pov. I'm looking up another brazillion things right now, so I'm not doing due diligence to the tag like I ought to. Anyway, what3ver/What3ver, anyway. I think this entry could use some looking at, for fixing. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hand plastination.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Plastination. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Plastination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I went to http://www.amazinghumanbody.com.au/ yesterday, quite cool. It uses the plastination technique, but does not seem to be related to the original inventor in any way.
Also, there's a slightly different process on display there, called tubular casts or some such, where a resin is injected into the veins/arteries of a limb or organ, then the surrounding flesh removed. Is this still plastination or is it some separate process?
cheers, Clinton.
http://tvnewswatch.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/rumours-persist-following-gu-kailai.html 47.60.67.17 ( talk) 10:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Proponents for the increased respect and courtesey for the human body point out that the inventors went ahead with the institute without due consideration to alretnative non intrusive methods of anatomy illustration such as digital computer rendered simulation. Computer simulation of the human body would alow much closer and detailed analysis of the human body. Zoom in, see through and body position maneuverability could allow a digitally simulated model much greater detail and content than a physical model ever could. Redistributing the simulations in the form of software over the internet, could further accomplish a broader viewer base and through a much more flexible means without ever requiring the use of bodies. Because of the versatility of software and the development of computer technology today, a virtual model is not only vastly supperior and more available to viewers world wide, but also an opportunity for further scientific development. The lack of a free, open source, world wide online available simulation while continuation of plastination, is not only unscientific, but also disrespectfull to the human body. -Written without signing by User:Nadyes
What controversy? This is apparently written by someone who knows hardly anything. At least for the coming 100years plastination won`t be replaceable by any other technique and even then only partially. Besides not everyone is a religious fundamentalist and believes that throwing a stone is disrespectful or likewise using dead carcasses with complete anonymity. Besides what you said gotta be the stupiest thing i heard in a year or so. CT is used because it can be performed in a live individual but it will never not even close exceed an actual cutting tomography. Theoretically not possible and there are worlds in between. Yes Plastination also enabled cutting tomography. I can savely claim that plastination will be used for the next several hundreds of years. Slicky 15:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Someone should consider seperating criticisms out of the main article (see step seven) ... and this is a kinda one sided argument article. 69.158.59.78 14:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The article makes no mention of the history of allegations that the Chinese government has sold the bodies of political prisoners for use in plastination. This subject has received news coverage, is the subject of legislation, and deserves coverage here. 21:27, October 31, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.203.88.125 ( talk) 19:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The link to "List of US patents by Gunther von Hagens" seems to be dead, but I would rather someone replace it than just remove it, as the subject seems fairly interesting.
The last paragraph of the main section was poorly written, unencyclopedic, and completely POV. I removed the whole thing, as it contributed nothing to the article and made it read like a junior high school paper. DrExtreme 21:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm tagging this article with wp:coi and wp:pov. I'm looking up another brazillion things right now, so I'm not doing due diligence to the tag like I ought to. Anyway, what3ver/What3ver, anyway. I think this entry could use some looking at, for fixing. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hand plastination.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Plastination. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)