The contents of the Rogeting page were merged into Plagiarism on 15 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Rogeting was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 March 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Plagiarism. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Plagiarism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
I propose deleting this very confused and confusing section because it is self-contradictory, and lacks any relevant examples. One cannot be accused of plagiarising oneself. Peterlewis ( talk) 20:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Those articles you refer to are presumably non-peer reviewed: I was after journal papers which have been double checked by others. There is a great deal of dros on the internet, which Wikipedia should not repeat. You are still ignoring the basic point of logic in the definition. Peterlewis ( talk) 04:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
It is nothing to do with what I think, but what logic dictates. You have simply not addressed the problem suggested by the definition from Webster. And you have provided no examples, like the article itself. I looked at those pages but they don't give examples either and ignore the logic. Self-plagiarism is a non-existent concept by your own definition. Peterlewis ( talk) 15:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Most of the comments above in this section are very old and this section should probably be archived. Not going anywhere. Mervyn Emrys ( talk) 01:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I second Dannyno. Peterlewis's argument is entirely opinionated and irrelevant. Hiretsuna de~yuo ( talk) 21:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
In academics, the professor/supervisor often either takes credit for the work of his employees or students without making substantial contributions, or forces their employees to add team members as authors even though their contribution was minimal (gift authorship). This is much more frequent and nefarious than student's plagiarism and deserves its own section.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 31 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lareinahuang, Plantmom13, SolidBill, Benpppp ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Roach Jefferson ( talk) 23:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Lareinahuang ( talk) 22:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
-add information in the On the Internet section and discuss how technology has contributed to the increase in plagiarism
-reverse the order of paragraphs in the "Academia" section
-add more information about plagiarism detectors (e.g. Turnitin)
-discuss the potential problems of plagiarism detectors (copyright infringement/adversarial relationship between students and teachers)
-add information about plagiarism in education Lareinahuang ( talk) 22:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The contents of the Rogeting page were merged into Plagiarism on 15 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Rogeting was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 March 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Plagiarism. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Plagiarism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
I propose deleting this very confused and confusing section because it is self-contradictory, and lacks any relevant examples. One cannot be accused of plagiarising oneself. Peterlewis ( talk) 20:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Those articles you refer to are presumably non-peer reviewed: I was after journal papers which have been double checked by others. There is a great deal of dros on the internet, which Wikipedia should not repeat. You are still ignoring the basic point of logic in the definition. Peterlewis ( talk) 04:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
It is nothing to do with what I think, but what logic dictates. You have simply not addressed the problem suggested by the definition from Webster. And you have provided no examples, like the article itself. I looked at those pages but they don't give examples either and ignore the logic. Self-plagiarism is a non-existent concept by your own definition. Peterlewis ( talk) 15:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Most of the comments above in this section are very old and this section should probably be archived. Not going anywhere. Mervyn Emrys ( talk) 01:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I second Dannyno. Peterlewis's argument is entirely opinionated and irrelevant. Hiretsuna de~yuo ( talk) 21:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
In academics, the professor/supervisor often either takes credit for the work of his employees or students without making substantial contributions, or forces their employees to add team members as authors even though their contribution was minimal (gift authorship). This is much more frequent and nefarious than student's plagiarism and deserves its own section.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 31 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lareinahuang, Plantmom13, SolidBill, Benpppp ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Roach Jefferson ( talk) 23:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Lareinahuang ( talk) 22:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
-add information in the On the Internet section and discuss how technology has contributed to the increase in plagiarism
-reverse the order of paragraphs in the "Academia" section
-add more information about plagiarism detectors (e.g. Turnitin)
-discuss the potential problems of plagiarism detectors (copyright infringement/adversarial relationship between students and teachers)
-add information about plagiarism in education Lareinahuang ( talk) 22:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)