From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion Hang On

The article fails to meet Criteria A7, because it is a notable organization. The team has participated in international and domestic quidditch tournaments, and is notable enough for their own article as a result of their performances in such tournaments. Unless there is other criteria that this article does not adequately meet, I see no reason to delete this article. Quidster4040 ( talk) 19:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Typically, notability is denoted by non-trivial coverage in secondary sources. See WP:NOTE. I've attempted to help by adding some coverage, but additional sources would be beneficial. CrazyPaco ( talk) 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion Hang On

The article fails to meet Criteria A7, because it is a notable organization. The team has participated in international and domestic quidditch tournaments, and is notable enough for their own article as a result of their performances in such tournaments. Unless there is other criteria that this article does not adequately meet, I see no reason to delete this article. Quidster4040 ( talk) 19:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Typically, notability is denoted by non-trivial coverage in secondary sources. See WP:NOTE. I've attempted to help by adding some coverage, but additional sources would be beneficial. CrazyPaco ( talk) 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook