From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Hertfordshire Start‑class ( inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Who ist the current lord?

I could not find any reference to the current title holder - is it dormant? Anton 77.1.17.200 ( talk) 09:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

"Ist"? You wouldn't be German by any chance? Please stop this. Stephenb (Talk) 20:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

I would be interested too. So far, It Seems as if Marco V. Neumüller is the legally correct lord.-- 94.219.61.254 ( talk) 17:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Not Marco again. This has been rejected a long time ago (check revision history of talk page 2006-2012).-- Juddcartwright ( talk) 07:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Undersourced since 2012

This article is long and not well-written, but the references given are barely enough to support a stub. Unless anyone can give me a good reason, I propose to cut it down to that stub so that it can be rewritten properly. I'll wait a few days in case there are any policy-based objections. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 18:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Hertfordshire Start‑class ( inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Who ist the current lord?

I could not find any reference to the current title holder - is it dormant? Anton 77.1.17.200 ( talk) 09:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

"Ist"? You wouldn't be German by any chance? Please stop this. Stephenb (Talk) 20:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

I would be interested too. So far, It Seems as if Marco V. Neumüller is the legally correct lord.-- 94.219.61.254 ( talk) 17:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Not Marco again. This has been rejected a long time ago (check revision history of talk page 2006-2012).-- Juddcartwright ( talk) 07:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Undersourced since 2012

This article is long and not well-written, but the references given are barely enough to support a stub. Unless anyone can give me a good reason, I propose to cut it down to that stub so that it can be rewritten properly. I'll wait a few days in case there are any policy-based objections. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 18:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook