The astrological information should be on another page called Pisces (astrology) since it has no bearing on the astronomical constelation. The sun is not even in the constelation during the dates of the Pisces sign. Lumos3 07:54, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Pisces.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 1, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-05-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
On page 343 in Richard Hinckley Allen's book STAR NAMES - their lore and meaning, there is something which seems to be a mystery. A certain Maxwell Hall regarded the 6-th magnitude double star 65 Piscium as the central sun of the universe. Why the star 65 Piscium? And who was Maxwell Hall? All of this could be interesting information for the article, but I want to know if there are more sources than only page 343 of R. H. Allen's STAR NAMES. DannyCaes ( talk) 13:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
According to your own list, clearly there is only one ... and the English is dire also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.253.184 ( talk) 08:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I’m one of them 2600:6C63:6E7F:4AB4:10DC:7711:D467:4398 ( talk) 12:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The astrological information should be on another page called Pisces (astrology) since it has no bearing on the astronomical constelation. The sun is not even in the constelation during the dates of the Pisces sign. Lumos3 07:54, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Pisces.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 1, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-05-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
On page 343 in Richard Hinckley Allen's book STAR NAMES - their lore and meaning, there is something which seems to be a mystery. A certain Maxwell Hall regarded the 6-th magnitude double star 65 Piscium as the central sun of the universe. Why the star 65 Piscium? And who was Maxwell Hall? All of this could be interesting information for the article, but I want to know if there are more sources than only page 343 of R. H. Allen's STAR NAMES. DannyCaes ( talk) 13:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
According to your own list, clearly there is only one ... and the English is dire also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.253.184 ( talk) 08:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I’m one of them 2600:6C63:6E7F:4AB4:10DC:7711:D467:4398 ( talk) 12:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)